TY - JOUR
T1 - Bone marrow WT1 levels at diagnosis, post-induction and post-intensification in adult de novo AML
AU - Nomdedéu, J. F.
AU - Hoyos, M.
AU - Carricondo, M.
AU - Bussaglia, E.
AU - Estivill, C.
AU - Esteve, J.
AU - Tormo, M.
AU - Duarte, R.
AU - Salamero, O.
AU - De Llano, M. P.Q.
AU - García, A.
AU - Bargay, J.
AU - Heras, I.
AU - Martí-Tutusaus, J. M.
AU - Llorente, A.
AU - Ribera, J. M.
AU - Gallardo, D.
AU - Aventin, A.
AU - Brunet, S.
AU - Sierra, J.
PY - 2013/1/1
Y1 - 2013/1/1
N2 - We retrospectively assessed whether normalized bone marrow WT1 levels could be used for risk stratification in a consecutive series of 584 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. A cutoff value of 5065 copies at diagnosis identified two prognostic groups (overall survival (OS): 44±3 vs 36±3%, P=0.023; leukemia-free survival (LFS): 47±3 vs 36±4%, P=0.038; and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR): 37±3 vs 47±4%, P=:0.043). Three groups were identified on the basis of WT1 levels post-induction: Group 0 (WT1 between 0 and 17.5 copies, 134 patients, OS: 59±4%, LFS:59±4% and CIR: 26±4%); Group 1 (WT1 between 17.6 and 170.5 copies, 160 patients, OS: 48±5%, LFS:41±4% and CIR: 45±4%); and Group 2 (WT1 >170.5 copies, 71 patients, OS: 23±6%, LFS: 19±7% and CIR: 68±8%) (P<0.001). Post-intensification samples distinguished three groups: patients with WT1 >100 copies (47 patients, 16%); an intermediate group of patients with WT1 between 10 and 100 copies (148 patients, 52%); and a third group with WT1 <10 copies (92 patients, 32%). Outcomes differed significantly in terms of OS (30±7%, 59±4%, 72±5%), LFS (24±7%, 46±4%, 65±5%) and relapse probability (CIR 72±7%, 45±4%, 25±5%), all P<0.001. WT1 levels in bone marrow assayed using the standardized ELN method provide relevant prognostic information in de novo AML. © 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited.
AB - We retrospectively assessed whether normalized bone marrow WT1 levels could be used for risk stratification in a consecutive series of 584 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. A cutoff value of 5065 copies at diagnosis identified two prognostic groups (overall survival (OS): 44±3 vs 36±3%, P=0.023; leukemia-free survival (LFS): 47±3 vs 36±4%, P=0.038; and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR): 37±3 vs 47±4%, P=:0.043). Three groups were identified on the basis of WT1 levels post-induction: Group 0 (WT1 between 0 and 17.5 copies, 134 patients, OS: 59±4%, LFS:59±4% and CIR: 26±4%); Group 1 (WT1 between 17.6 and 170.5 copies, 160 patients, OS: 48±5%, LFS:41±4% and CIR: 45±4%); and Group 2 (WT1 >170.5 copies, 71 patients, OS: 23±6%, LFS: 19±7% and CIR: 68±8%) (P<0.001). Post-intensification samples distinguished three groups: patients with WT1 >100 copies (47 patients, 16%); an intermediate group of patients with WT1 between 10 and 100 copies (148 patients, 52%); and a third group with WT1 <10 copies (92 patients, 32%). Outcomes differed significantly in terms of OS (30±7%, 59±4%, 72±5%), LFS (24±7%, 46±4%, 65±5%) and relapse probability (CIR 72±7%, 45±4%, 25±5%), all P<0.001. WT1 levels in bone marrow assayed using the standardized ELN method provide relevant prognostic information in de novo AML. © 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited.
KW - minimal residual disease
KW - molecular diagnostics
KW - WT1
U2 - 10.1038/leu.2013.111
DO - 10.1038/leu.2013.111
M3 - Article
VL - 27
SP - 2157
EP - 2164
JO - Leukemia
JF - Leukemia
SN - 0887-6924
IS - 11
ER -