Bluetongue epidemiology in wild ruminants from Southern Spain

Ignacio García, Sebastián Napp, Jordi Casal, Anselmo Perea, Alberto Allepuz, Anna Alba, Alfonso Carbonero, Antonio Arenas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

47 Citations (Scopus)


Serum samples from 210 wild ruminants collected between 2006 and 2007 in southern Spain were tested for antibodies against bluetongue virus (BTV) by means of a competitive ELISA assay. Eighty-seven of the 210 wild ruminants analysed (41%) showed antibodies against BTV. Statistically significant differences were found in the seroprevalence among species: 66% (65 of 98) for red deer (Cervus elaphus), 50% (ten of 20) for fallow deer (Dama dama), 33% (three of nine) for mouflon (Ovis aries musimon) and 11% (nine of 83) for Spanish ibex (Capra pyrenaica). Overall, the sites where seropositive wild ruminants were found coincide with the areas where BTV had been detected in livestock, but in eastern Sierra Morena, the virus circulated in wild ruminants, although it had not been detected in domestic ruminants in the same areas. Wild ruminants over 1-year of age (sub-adults and adults) had significantly higher seroprevalences than juvenile animals. Statistically significant differences were also observed between BTV seroprevalence and management (free-ranging vs. captivity) with higher prevalence in free-ranging animals. The high seroprevalences obtained suggest that BTV is widespread in wild ruminants in southern Spain. This factor could have an important influence on the evolution of the infection in domestic livestock and indicates the need to include wild ruminant species in BTV surveillance or control programs. © 2008 Springer-Verlag.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)173-178
JournalEuropean Journal of Wildlife Research
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2009


  • Bluetongue
  • Serosurvey
  • Spain
  • Wild ruminants


Dive into the research topics of 'Bluetongue epidemiology in wild ruminants from Southern Spain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this