Bioenergy production and sustainable development: science base for policymaking remains limited

Carmenza Robledo-Abad, Hans Jörg Althaus, Göran Berndes, Simon Bolwig, Esteve Corbera, Felix Creutzig, John Garcia-Ulloa, Anna Geddes, Jay S. Gregg, Helmut Haberl, Susanne Hanger, Richard J. Harper, Carol Hunsberger, Rasmus K. Larsen, Christian Lauk, Stefan Leitner, Johan Lilliestam, Hermann Lotze-Campen, Bart Muys, Maria NordborgMaria Ölund, Boris Orlowsky, Alexander Popp, Joana Portugal-Pereira, Jürgen Reinhard, Lena Scheiffle, Pete Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© 2016 The Authors. Global Change Biology Bioenergy Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The possibility of using bioenergy as a climate change mitigation measure has sparked a discussion of whether and how bioenergy production contributes to sustainable development. We undertook a systematic review of the scientific literature to illuminate this relationship and found a limited scientific basis for policymaking. Our results indicate that knowledge on the sustainable development impacts of bioenergy production is concentrated in a few well-studied countries, focuses on environmental and economic impacts, and mostly relates to dedicated agricultural biomass plantations. The scope and methodological approaches in studies differ widely and only a small share of the studies sufficiently reports on context and/or baseline conditions, which makes it difficult to get a general understanding of the attribution of impacts. Nevertheless, we identified regional patterns of positive or negative impacts for all categories – environmental, economic, institutional, social and technological. In general, economic and technological impacts were more frequently reported as positive, while social and environmental impacts were more frequently reported as negative (with the exception of impacts on direct substitution of GHG emission from fossil fuel). More focused and transparent research is needed to validate these patterns and develop a strong science underpinning for establishing policies and governance agreements that prevent/mitigate negative and promote positive impacts from bioenergy production.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)541-556
JournalGCB Bioenergy
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017

Keywords

  • agriculture
  • bioenergy
  • food security
  • forestry
  • mitigation
  • sustainable development

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bioenergy production and sustainable development: science base for policymaking remains limited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this