Between deliberation and negotiation: The case of the Mountain Forum in Aragon

Quim Brugué, Marc Parés

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article discusses how the wicked problem of «the mountains» in Aragón, a historical and highly complex conflict, has been approached through deliberation. Our aim is to respond to a larger theoretical issue: the viability and functionality of deliberation as a tool to produce better public policies in a context of high political and social conflict. We conclude that, although it is possible to generate deliberative spaces of quality that produce significant impacts on public policy, high-conflict contexts threaten the delicate deliberative balance. In our case study, in addition, there is a shift from deliberation to negotiation. Operating guidelines in deliberative spaces, the behaviour of the actors and the political leadership are shown as those aspects that determine the success of deliberation in a context of conflict.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-101
JournalRevista de Estudios Politicos
Issue number158
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2012

Keywords

  • Conflict
  • Deliberative democracy
  • Deliberative quality
  • Evaluation
  • Negotiation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Between deliberation and negotiation: The case of the Mountain Forum in Aragon'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this