Assessment of focused ultrasound stimulation to induce peripheral nerve activity and potential damage in vivo

Bruno Rodriguez Meana, Eva Santos Nogueira, Sònia Trujillo-Vázquez, Anette Jakob, Esther Udina i Bonet, Marc Fournelle, X. (Xavier) Navarro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Introduction: Peripheral neuroprostheses are aimed to restore loss of sensory and motor functions by interfacing axons in the peripheral nerves. Most common interfaces in neuroprostheses are electrodes that establish electrical connection with peripheral axons. However, some challenges arise related to long-term functionality, durability, and body response. Recently, focused ultrasound stimulation (FUS) has emerged as a non-invasive approach to modulate the nervous system. However, it is controversial whether FUS can induce axon depolarization. Methods: We have assessed FUS applied in vivo to the rat peripheral nerve, with two objectives: first, to test whether FUS activates peripheral nerves under different stimulation conditions, and second, to evaluate if FUS inflicts damage to the nerve. FUS was delivered with three ultrasound transducers (Sonic Concept H115, H107, and H102) covering the largest set of parameters examined for FUS of peripheral nerves so far. Results: We did not obtain reliable evoked action potentials in either nerves or muscles, under any FUS condition applied, neither over the skin nor directly to the nerve exposed. Additional experiments ex vivo and in vivo on mice, confirmed this conclusion. When FUS stimulation was applied directly to the exposed sciatic nerve, neuromuscular function decreased significantly, and recovered one week later, except for FUS at 0.25 MHz. Histologically, degenerating nerve fibers were observed, with a tendency to be higher with the lower FUS frequency. Discussion: Past reports on the ability of ultrasound to stimulate the peripheral nerve are controversial. After testing a wide range of FUS conditions, we conclude that it is not a reliable and safe method for stimulating the peripheral nerve. Special consideration should be taken, especially when low-frequency FUS is applied, as it may lead to nerve damage.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1346412
Number of pages11
JournalFrontiers in Neurology
Volume15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Feb 2024

Keywords

  • Electrophysiology
  • Nerve damage
  • Nerve interface
  • Nerve stimulation
  • Sciatic nerve
  • Ultrasound

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of focused ultrasound stimulation to induce peripheral nerve activity and potential damage in vivo'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • CIBERNED_Patología neuromuscular clínica y experimental

    Navarro Acebes, X. (Principal Investigator), Aguilera Avila, J. (Investigator), Arbat Plana, A. (Investigator), Bosch, A. (Investigator), Bruna Escuer, J. (Investigator), Candalija Iserte, A. M. (Investigator), Casas, C. (Investigator), Catala Solsona, J. (Investigator), Cobianchi , S. (Investigator), Coll Miro, M. (Investigator), Cuadras Mas, J. (Investigator), Del Valle Macia, J. (Investigator), Enriquez Barreto, L. (Investigator), Francos Quijorna, I. (Investigator), González Pérez, F. J. (Investigator), Hernández Martín, J. (Investigator), Herrando Grabulosa, M. (Investigator), Jaramillo Rodríguez, J. (Investigator), Lopez Vales, R. (Investigator), López Serrano, C. (Investigator), López Álvarez, V. M. (Investigator), Martínez Muriana, A. (Investigator), Modol Caballero, G. (Investigator), Morell Orduña, M. (Investigator), Oliva Muñoz, N. D. L. (Investigator), Rodriguez Alvarez, J. (Investigator), Romeo Guitart, D. (Investigator), Santos Rojas, D. H. (Investigator), Siedlecki Wullich, D. J. (Investigator), Torres Espín, A. (Investigator), Udina Bonet, E. (Investigator), Garcia Garcia, J. (Investigator), Lopez Santos, D. (Investigator) & Badia Puiggali, C. (Investigator)

    1/01/0831/12/30

    Project: Research Projects and Other Grants

Cite this