TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing Environmental Performance of Micromobility Using LCA and Self-Reported Modal Change
T2 - The Case of Shared E-Bikes, E-Scooters, and E-Mopeds in Barcelona
AU - Felipe Falgas, Pol
AU - Madrid-Lopez, Cristina
AU - Marquet, Oriol
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2022/3/30
Y1 - 2022/3/30
N2 - Micromobility is often thought of as a sustainable solution to many urban mobility chal-lenges. The literature to date, however, has struggled to find consensus on the sustainability of shared and electric scooters, e-bikes, and e-mopeds. This paper uses a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach to calculate the impacts of micromobility modes in three categories: Global Warming Potential (GWP), Particulate Matter Formation, and Ozone Formation. It does so by incorporating the self-reported modal change of each transportation mode: shared e-moped, shared e-bicycle, shared bicycle, and personal e-scooter. The results show that modal change brought by the introduction of shared e-mopeds and shared e-bicycles caused an increase in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, while shared bicycles and personal electric scooters decreased GHG emissions. All micromobility modes except personal e-scooters increased particulate matter emissions, but decreased those which were emitted within the city, while they all decreased NOx. The findings of this study suggest new micromobility services are not always the best environmental solution for urban mobility, unless the eco-design of vehicles is improved, and they are strategically used and deployed as part of a holistic vision for transport policy.
AB - Micromobility is often thought of as a sustainable solution to many urban mobility chal-lenges. The literature to date, however, has struggled to find consensus on the sustainability of shared and electric scooters, e-bikes, and e-mopeds. This paper uses a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach to calculate the impacts of micromobility modes in three categories: Global Warming Potential (GWP), Particulate Matter Formation, and Ozone Formation. It does so by incorporating the self-reported modal change of each transportation mode: shared e-moped, shared e-bicycle, shared bicycle, and personal e-scooter. The results show that modal change brought by the introduction of shared e-mopeds and shared e-bicycles caused an increase in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, while shared bicycles and personal electric scooters decreased GHG emissions. All micromobility modes except personal e-scooters increased particulate matter emissions, but decreased those which were emitted within the city, while they all decreased NOx. The findings of this study suggest new micromobility services are not always the best environmental solution for urban mobility, unless the eco-design of vehicles is improved, and they are strategically used and deployed as part of a holistic vision for transport policy.
KW - environmental performance
KW - greenhouse gas emissions
KW - life cycle assessment
KW - micromobility
KW - modal change
KW - public health
KW - shared mobility
KW - two-wheeled vehicles
KW - environmental performance
KW - greenhouse gas emissions
KW - life cycle assessment
KW - micromobility
KW - modal change
KW - public health
KW - shared mobility
KW - two-wheeled vehicles
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128242329&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/7e46d832-fcbb-3f7c-8598-f5ff8eba4b4b/
U2 - 10.3390/su14074139
DO - 10.3390/su14074139
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85128242329
SN - 2071-1050
VL - 14
JO - Sustainability
JF - Sustainability
IS - 7
M1 - 4139
ER -