Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment

Brian Leung; Nuria Roura-Pascual; Sven Bacher; Jaakko Heikkilä; Lluis Brotons; Mark A. Burgman; Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz; Franz Essl; Philip E. Hulme; David M. Richardson; Daniel Sol

doi:10.1111/ele.12172

Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment

Brian Leung, Nuria Roura-Pascual, Sven Bacher, Jaakko Heikkilä, Lluis Brotons, Mark A. Burgman, Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz, Franz Essl, Philip E. Hulme, David M. Richardson, Daniel Sol

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We address criticism that the Transport, Establishment, Abundance, Spread, Impact (TEASI) framework does not facilitate objective mapping of risk assessment methods nor defines best practice. We explain why TEASI is appropriate for mapping, despite inherent challenges, and how TEASI offers considerations for best practices, rather than suggesting one best practice. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Original language	English
Journal	Ecology Letters
Volume	16
Issue number	11
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12172
Publication status	Published - 1 Nov 2013

Keywords

Colonisation
Exotic
Habitat suitability
Life history trait
Non-indigenous
Policy
Propagule pressure
Risk analysis
Species distribution
Uncertainty

Access to Document

10.1111/ele.12172

Cite this

@article{8f60011646044053996e07da6a634df3,

title = "Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment",

abstract = "We address criticism that the Transport, Establishment, Abundance, Spread, Impact (TEASI) framework does not facilitate objective mapping of risk assessment methods nor defines best practice. We explain why TEASI is appropriate for mapping, despite inherent challenges, and how TEASI offers considerations for best practices, rather than suggesting one best practice. {\textcopyright} 2013 John Wiley \& Sons Ltd/CNRS.",

keywords = "Colonisation, Exotic, Habitat suitability, Life history trait, Non-indigenous, Policy, Propagule pressure, Risk analysis, Species distribution, Uncertainty",

author = "Brian Leung and Nuria Roura-Pascual and Sven Bacher and Jaakko Heikkil{\"a} and Lluis Brotons and Burgman, \{Mark A.\} and Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz and Franz Essl and Hulme, \{Philip E.\} and Richardson, \{David M.\} and Daniel Sol",

year = "2013",

month = nov,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/ele.12172",

language = "English",

volume = "16",

number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment

AU - Leung, Brian

AU - Roura-Pascual, Nuria

AU - Bacher, Sven

AU - Heikkilä, Jaakko

AU - Brotons, Lluis

AU - Burgman, Mark A.

AU - Dehnen-Schmutz, Katharina

AU - Essl, Franz

AU - Hulme, Philip E.

AU - Richardson, David M.

AU - Sol, Daniel

PY - 2013/11/1

Y1 - 2013/11/1

N2 - We address criticism that the Transport, Establishment, Abundance, Spread, Impact (TEASI) framework does not facilitate objective mapping of risk assessment methods nor defines best practice. We explain why TEASI is appropriate for mapping, despite inherent challenges, and how TEASI offers considerations for best practices, rather than suggesting one best practice. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

AB - We address criticism that the Transport, Establishment, Abundance, Spread, Impact (TEASI) framework does not facilitate objective mapping of risk assessment methods nor defines best practice. We explain why TEASI is appropriate for mapping, despite inherent challenges, and how TEASI offers considerations for best practices, rather than suggesting one best practice. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

KW - Colonisation

KW - Exotic

KW - Habitat suitability

KW - Life history trait

KW - Non-indigenous

KW - Policy

KW - Propagule pressure

KW - Risk analysis

KW - Species distribution

KW - Uncertainty

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84885953369

U2 - 10.1111/ele.12172

DO - 10.1111/ele.12172

M3 - Article

SN - 1461-023X

VL - 16

JO - Ecology Letters

JF - Ecology Letters

IS - 11

ER -

Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this