A straw man's neogenome

O. Vilarroya

doi:10.1017/S0140525X12001343

A straw man's neogenome

O. Vilarroya

Department of Psychiatry and Legal Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › Research › peer-review

Abstract

The neogenome has indeed changed how to understand the relationship between genotype and phenotype. However, this does not imply a paradigm shift, but simply a normal development of a young science. Charney creates a straw man out of the myth of an immutable genetics, and conveys the wrong idea that heritability studies and gene association studies are no longer valid. © 2012 Cambridge University Press.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	380-381
Journal	Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume	35
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12001343
Publication status	Published - 1 Oct 2012

Access to Document

10.1017/S0140525X12001343

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A straw man's neogenome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{6fe4a2ad836d41df87aff67caffbd58e,

title = "A straw man's neogenome",

abstract = "The neogenome has indeed changed how to understand the relationship between genotype and phenotype. However, this does not imply a paradigm shift, but simply a normal development of a young science. Charney creates a straw man out of the myth of an immutable genetics, and conveys the wrong idea that heritability studies and gene association studies are no longer valid. {\textcopyright} 2012 Cambridge University Press.",

author = "O. Vilarroya",

year = "2012",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1017/S0140525X12001343",

language = "English",

volume = "35",

pages = "380--381",

journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",

issn = "0140-525X",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A straw man's neogenome

AU - Vilarroya, O.

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - The neogenome has indeed changed how to understand the relationship between genotype and phenotype. However, this does not imply a paradigm shift, but simply a normal development of a young science. Charney creates a straw man out of the myth of an immutable genetics, and conveys the wrong idea that heritability studies and gene association studies are no longer valid. © 2012 Cambridge University Press.

AB - The neogenome has indeed changed how to understand the relationship between genotype and phenotype. However, this does not imply a paradigm shift, but simply a normal development of a young science. Charney creates a straw man out of the myth of an immutable genetics, and conveys the wrong idea that heritability studies and gene association studies are no longer valid. © 2012 Cambridge University Press.

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X12001343

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X12001343

M3 - Review article

VL - 35

SP - 380

EP - 381

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

IS - 5

ER -