A relation between small amplitude and big limit cycles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are two well-known methods for generating limit cycles for planar systems with a nondegenerate critical point of focus type: the degenerate Hopf bifurcation and the Poincaré-Melnikov method; that is, the study of small perturbations of Hamiltonian systems. The first one gives the so-called small amplitude limit cycles, while the second one gives limit cycles which tend to some concrete periodic orbits of the Hamiltonian system when the perturbation goes to zero (big limit cycles, for short). The goal of this paper is to relate both methods. In fact, in all the families of differential equations that we have studied, both methods generate the same number of limit cycles. The families studied include Lienard systems and systems with homogeneous nonlinearities. © 2001 Rocky Mountain Mathematics Consortium.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1277-1303
JournalRocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2001

Keywords

  • Degenerated Hopf bifurcation
  • Limit cycle
  • Poincaré- Melnikov function

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A relation between small amplitude and big limit cycles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this