TY - JOUR
T1 - When polarised feelings towards parties spread to voters
T2 - The role of ideological distance and social sorting in Spain
AU - Comellas Bonsfills, Josep Maria
N1 - I am especially grateful to my PhD supervisor, Mariano Torcal, for his guidance in the elaboration of this paper, as well as for giving me the opportunity to collaborate with him on the E-DEM project. I am also very thankful to Luana Russo and Markus Wagner for their excellent comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this paper. Finally, I would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their useful comments.
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Affective polarisation measured with feelings towards parties tends to overestimate the degree to which people dislike voters of opposing parties. This paper explores some of the factors that account for the gap between party affective polarisation (PAP) and voter affective polarisation (VAP). In particular, I first argue and show that the PAP-VAP gap increases with ideological distance between individuals and out-parties, although this difference begins to decrease after a certain level of ideological discrepancy is achieved. Second, social sorting increases the probability that individuals extend their antipathy towards parties to their voters, thus reducing the PAP-VAP gap. Third, whereas ideological distance leads to VAP among individuals with low levels of social sorting, it does not make a difference for socially sorted people. I discuss the relevance of these two factors by utilising the third wave of the E-DEM panel. The results have relevant implications for the consequences of affective polarisation.
AB - Affective polarisation measured with feelings towards parties tends to overestimate the degree to which people dislike voters of opposing parties. This paper explores some of the factors that account for the gap between party affective polarisation (PAP) and voter affective polarisation (VAP). In particular, I first argue and show that the PAP-VAP gap increases with ideological distance between individuals and out-parties, although this difference begins to decrease after a certain level of ideological discrepancy is achieved. Second, social sorting increases the probability that individuals extend their antipathy towards parties to their voters, thus reducing the PAP-VAP gap. Third, whereas ideological distance leads to VAP among individuals with low levels of social sorting, it does not make a difference for socially sorted people. I discuss the relevance of these two factors by utilising the third wave of the E-DEM panel. The results have relevant implications for the consequences of affective polarisation.
KW - Voter affective polarisation
KW - Party affective polarisation
KW - Ideological polarisation
KW - Social sorting
KW - Spain
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85138568126
U2 - 10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102525
DO - 10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102525
M3 - Article
SN - 0261-3794
VL - 79
JO - Electoral Studies
JF - Electoral Studies
M1 - 102525
ER -