TY - JOUR
T1 - Weed suppression greatly increased by plant diversity in intensively managed grasslands :
T2 - a continental-scale experiment
AU - Connolly, John
AU - Sebastià, Maria Teresa
AU - Kirwan, Laura
AU - Finn, John Anthony
AU - Llurba, Rosa
AU - Suter, Matthias
AU - Collins, Rosemary P.
AU - Porqueddu, Claudio
AU - Helgadóttir, Áslaug
AU - Baadshaug, Ole H.
AU - Bélanger, Gilles
AU - Black, Alistair
AU - Brophy, Caroline
AU - Čop, Jure
AU - Dalmannsdóttir, Sigridur
AU - Delgado Enguita, Ignacio
AU - Elgersma, Anjo
AU - Fothergill, Michael
AU - Frankow Lindberg, Bodil E.
AU - Ghesquiere, An
AU - Golinski, Piotr
AU - Grieu, Philippe
AU - Gustavsson, Anne-Maj
AU - Höglind, Mats
AU - Huguenin Elie, Olivier
AU - Jørgensen, Marit
AU - Kadziuliene, Zydre
AU - Lunnan, Tor
AU - Nykanen Kurki, Paivi
AU - Ribas Artola, Àngela
AU - Taube, Friedhelm
AU - Thumm, Ulrich
AU - Vliegher, Alex De
AU - Lüscher, Andreas
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - 1. Grassland diversity can support sustainable intensification of grassland production through increased yields, reduced inputs and limited weed invasion. We report the effects of diversity on weed suppression from 3 years of a 31-site continental-scale field experiment. 2. At each site, 15 grassland communities comprising four monocultures and 11 four-species mixtures based on a wide range of species' proportions were sown at two densities and managed by cutting. Forage species were selected according to two crossed functional traits, "method of nitrogen acquisition" and "pattern of temporal development". 3. Across sites, years and sown densities, annual weed biomass in mixtures and monocultures was 0.5 and 2.0 t DM ha−1 (7% and 33% of total biomass respectively). Over 95% of mixtures had weed biomass lower than the average of monocultures, and in two-thirds of cases, lower than in the most suppressive monoculture (transgressive suppression). Suppression was significantly transgressive for 58% of site-years. Transgressive suppression by mixtures was maintained across years, independent of site productivity. 4. Based on models, average weed biomass in mixture over the whole experiment was 52% less (95% confidence interval: 30%-75%) than in the most suppressive monoculture. Transgressive suppression of weed biomass was significant at each year across all mixtures and for each mixture. 5. Weed biomass was consistently low across all mixtures and years and was in some cases significantly but not largely different from that in the equiproportional mixture. The average variability (standard deviation) of annual weed biomass within a site was much lower for mixtures (0.42) than for monocultures (1.77). 6. Synthesis and applications. Weed invasion can be diminished through a combination of forage species selected for complementarity and persistence traits in systems designed to reduce reliance on fertiliser nitrogen. In this study, effects of diversity on weed suppression were consistently strong across mixtures varying widely in species' proportions and over time. The level of weed biomass did not vary greatly across mixtures varying widely in proportions of sown species. These diversity benefits in intensively managed grasslands are relevant for the sustainable intensification of agriculture and, importantly, are achievable through practical farm-scale actions.
AB - 1. Grassland diversity can support sustainable intensification of grassland production through increased yields, reduced inputs and limited weed invasion. We report the effects of diversity on weed suppression from 3 years of a 31-site continental-scale field experiment. 2. At each site, 15 grassland communities comprising four monocultures and 11 four-species mixtures based on a wide range of species' proportions were sown at two densities and managed by cutting. Forage species were selected according to two crossed functional traits, "method of nitrogen acquisition" and "pattern of temporal development". 3. Across sites, years and sown densities, annual weed biomass in mixtures and monocultures was 0.5 and 2.0 t DM ha−1 (7% and 33% of total biomass respectively). Over 95% of mixtures had weed biomass lower than the average of monocultures, and in two-thirds of cases, lower than in the most suppressive monoculture (transgressive suppression). Suppression was significantly transgressive for 58% of site-years. Transgressive suppression by mixtures was maintained across years, independent of site productivity. 4. Based on models, average weed biomass in mixture over the whole experiment was 52% less (95% confidence interval: 30%-75%) than in the most suppressive monoculture. Transgressive suppression of weed biomass was significant at each year across all mixtures and for each mixture. 5. Weed biomass was consistently low across all mixtures and years and was in some cases significantly but not largely different from that in the equiproportional mixture. The average variability (standard deviation) of annual weed biomass within a site was much lower for mixtures (0.42) than for monocultures (1.77). 6. Synthesis and applications. Weed invasion can be diminished through a combination of forage species selected for complementarity and persistence traits in systems designed to reduce reliance on fertiliser nitrogen. In this study, effects of diversity on weed suppression were consistently strong across mixtures varying widely in species' proportions and over time. The level of weed biomass did not vary greatly across mixtures varying widely in proportions of sown species. These diversity benefits in intensively managed grasslands are relevant for the sustainable intensification of agriculture and, importantly, are achievable through practical farm-scale actions.
KW - Agro-ecology
KW - Evenness
KW - Forage swards
KW - Functional diversity
KW - Generalised diversity-interactions
KW - Legume-grass
KW - Nitrogen acquisition
KW - Sustainable agriculture
KW - Temporal development
KW - Transgressive
KW - Weed suppression
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85041946024
U2 - 10.1111/1365-2664.12991
DO - 10.1111/1365-2664.12991
M3 - Article
C2 - 29540935
SN - 0021-8901
VL - 55
SP - 852
EP - 862
JO - Journal of Applied Ecology
JF - Journal of Applied Ecology
IS - 2
ER -