TY - JOUR
T1 - Validity of self-reported diabetes in health interview surveys for measuring social inequalities in the prevalence of diabetes
AU - Espelt, A
AU - Goday, A
AU - Franch, J
AU - Borrell, C
PY - 2012/1/1
Y1 - 2012/1/1
N2 - Background To analyse the validity of diabetes declarations in a health interview survey in order to evaluate the appropriateness of using health interview surveys to understand the relationship between diabetes and social groups. Methods People with self-reported diabetes are those who report to have diabetes in the health survey. People with diabetes (gold standard) are those who were identified with fasting blood glucose level $126 mg/dl or those who were treated with oral antidiabetic drugs or insulin. Independent variables were educational level, social class and gender. The authors calculated sensitivity, specificity and k coefficient. Results The majority of indicators for evaluating the adequacy of using health interviews surveys to analyse inequalities in self-reported diabetes by social groups are good. The worst indicator was sensitivity, although it did not vary according to social groups. Conclusion Health surveys are a good instrument to evaluate the social inequalities in the prevalence of diabetes.
AB - Background To analyse the validity of diabetes declarations in a health interview survey in order to evaluate the appropriateness of using health interview surveys to understand the relationship between diabetes and social groups. Methods People with self-reported diabetes are those who report to have diabetes in the health survey. People with diabetes (gold standard) are those who were identified with fasting blood glucose level $126 mg/dl or those who were treated with oral antidiabetic drugs or insulin. Independent variables were educational level, social class and gender. The authors calculated sensitivity, specificity and k coefficient. Results The majority of indicators for evaluating the adequacy of using health interviews surveys to analyse inequalities in self-reported diabetes by social groups are good. The worst indicator was sensitivity, although it did not vary according to social groups. Conclusion Health surveys are a good instrument to evaluate the social inequalities in the prevalence of diabetes.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84864001601
U2 - 10.1136/jech.2010.112698
DO - 10.1136/jech.2010.112698
M3 - Article
SN - 0143-005X
VL - 66
JO - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
JF - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
IS - 7
ER -