TY - JOUR
T1 - Two year outcomes, cognitive and behavioral markers of decline in healthy, cognitively normal older persons with global deterioration scale stage 2 (Subjective cognitive decline with impairment)
AU - Reisberg, Barry
AU - Torossian, Carol
AU - Shulman, Melanie B.
AU - Monteiro, Isabel
AU - Boksay, Istvan
AU - Golomb, James
AU - Benarous, Francoise Guillo
AU - Ulysse, Anaztasia
AU - Oo, Thet
AU - Vedvyas, Alok
AU - Rao, Julia A.
AU - Marsh, Karyn
AU - Kluger, Alan
AU - Sangha, Jaspreet
AU - Hassan, Mudasar
AU - Alshalabi, Munther
AU - Arain, Fauzia
AU - Shaikh, Naveed
AU - Buj, Maja
AU - Kenowsky, Sunnie
AU - Masurkar, Arjun V.
AU - Rabin, Laura
AU - Noroozian, Maryam
AU - Sanchez-Saudinos, Maria Belen
AU - Blesa, Rafael
AU - Auer, Stefanie
AU - Zhang, Yian
AU - De Leon, Mony
AU - Sadowski, Martin
AU - Wisniewski, Thomas
AU - Gauthier, Serge
AU - Shao, Yongzhao
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - © 2019 IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved. Background: Little is known with respect to behavioral markers of subjective cognitive decline (SCD), a condition initially described in association with Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) stage 2. Objective: Two-year interval behavioral markers were investigated herein. Methods: Subjects from a published 7-year outcome study of GDS stage 2 subjects were selected. This study had demonstrated a hazard ratio of 4.5 for progression of GDS stage 2, in comparison with GDS stage 1 (no subjective or objective cognitive decline) subjects, after controlling for demographic and temporal variables. Because GDS 2 subjects have previously demonstrated impairment in comparison with healthy persons free of complaints, we herein suggest the terminology "SCD(I)" for these persons. 98 SCD(I) persons, 63 women and 35 men, mean baseline age, 67.12±8.75 years, with a mean educational background of 15.55±2.60 years, and mean baselineMMSEscores of 28.9±1.24 were followed for 2.13±0.30 years. Results: Observed annual decline on the GDS was 6.701% per annum, very close to a 1986 published estimate. At follow up, the MMSE, and 7 of 8 psychometric tests did not decline significantly. Of 21 Hamilton Depression Scale items, 2 improved and the remainder were unchanged. Anxieties declined from multiple perspectives. The Brief Cognitive Rating Scale (BCRS) declined significantly (p < 0.001), with component declines in Remote memory (p < 0.01), and Functioning/self-care (p = 0.01). Conclusion: SCD(I) persons decline at an annual rate of approximately 6.7%/year from several recent studies. The BCRS assessments and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test can be sensitive measures for future studies of progression mitigation.
AB - © 2019 IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved. Background: Little is known with respect to behavioral markers of subjective cognitive decline (SCD), a condition initially described in association with Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) stage 2. Objective: Two-year interval behavioral markers were investigated herein. Methods: Subjects from a published 7-year outcome study of GDS stage 2 subjects were selected. This study had demonstrated a hazard ratio of 4.5 for progression of GDS stage 2, in comparison with GDS stage 1 (no subjective or objective cognitive decline) subjects, after controlling for demographic and temporal variables. Because GDS 2 subjects have previously demonstrated impairment in comparison with healthy persons free of complaints, we herein suggest the terminology "SCD(I)" for these persons. 98 SCD(I) persons, 63 women and 35 men, mean baseline age, 67.12±8.75 years, with a mean educational background of 15.55±2.60 years, and mean baselineMMSEscores of 28.9±1.24 were followed for 2.13±0.30 years. Results: Observed annual decline on the GDS was 6.701% per annum, very close to a 1986 published estimate. At follow up, the MMSE, and 7 of 8 psychometric tests did not decline significantly. Of 21 Hamilton Depression Scale items, 2 improved and the remainder were unchanged. Anxieties declined from multiple perspectives. The Brief Cognitive Rating Scale (BCRS) declined significantly (p < 0.001), with component declines in Remote memory (p < 0.01), and Functioning/self-care (p = 0.01). Conclusion: SCD(I) persons decline at an annual rate of approximately 6.7%/year from several recent studies. The BCRS assessments and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test can be sensitive measures for future studies of progression mitigation.
KW - Aging
KW - behavioral disturbances
KW - cognition
KW - cognitive decline
KW - cognitive impairments
KW - longitudinal studies
KW - memory
KW - prognosis
KW - psychometric testing
KW - remote memory
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/two-year-outcomes-cognitive-behavioral-markers-decline-healthy-cognitively-normal-older-persons-glob
U2 - 10.3233/JAD-180341
DO - 10.3233/JAD-180341
M3 - Article
C2 - 30689585
SN - 1387-2877
VL - 67
SP - 685
EP - 705
JO - Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
JF - Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
ER -