TY - JOUR
T1 - Two opposing discourses of the integral management of rivers: the anthropocentric river versus the ecocentric river
AU - Sauri Pujol, David
AU - Ribas, A.
AU - Ventura, M.
PY - 2002/1/1
Y1 - 2002/1/1
N2 - Nowadays, most of our rivers are planned according to the feasible discourse of river integrated management. Despite this aim, river management is still problematic, especially in the relation between the «river natural uses» and the «river social uses». On this issue, the article attempts to show the social, scientific and management bases which turn «the river» into an incomplete concept. This is caused by the existence of two theoretic and pragmatic discourses, essentially different: the anthropocentric discourse and the ecocentric discourse.
AB - Nowadays, most of our rivers are planned according to the feasible discourse of river integrated management. Despite this aim, river management is still problematic, especially in the relation between the «river natural uses» and the «river social uses». On this issue, the article attempts to show the social, scientific and management bases which turn «the river» into an incomplete concept. This is caused by the existence of two theoretic and pragmatic discourses, essentially different: the anthropocentric discourse and the ecocentric discourse.
KW - Ecocentrism
KW - River integrated management
KW - Anthropocantrism
UR - https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=284609
U2 - 10.3989/egeogr.2002.i246.263
DO - 10.3989/egeogr.2002.i246.263
M3 - Article
SN - 0014-1496
VL - 246
SP - 119
EP - 142
JO - Estudios Geograficos
JF - Estudios Geograficos
IS - 246
ER -