TY - JOUR
T1 - Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment
AU - Martín-López, Berta
AU - Gómez-Baggethun, Erik
AU - García-Llorente, Marina
AU - Montes, Carlos
PY - 2014/2/1
Y1 - 2014/2/1
N2 - One of the key challenges for ecosystem services research is to develop a comprehensive methodological approach in which biophysical, socio-cultural and monetary value-domains can be explicitly considered and integrated into decision making processes. This paper operationalizes a methodological approach for ecosystem service assessment on the basis of value pluralism. We assessed eleven ecosystem services delivered in the Doñana social-ecological system (SW Spain). We found that different ecosystem service trade-offs came into view depending the value-domain in which services were assessed. The use of different valuation methods uncovers the fact that methods to elicit value actually shape and define the values being elicited. In this context, the prevalence of biophysical and monetary value-domains in scientific literature entails two main concerns: (1) the ecosystem service concept reflect in a limited extent the concerns of their beneficiaries, and (2) ecosystem service assessment results are biased towards the information provided by markets at the expense of other value-articulating institutions. Recognizing the role of ecosystem service assessment methods as value-articulating institutions, we call for a methodological framework able to contemplate the multidimensional nature of ecosystem services. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
AB - One of the key challenges for ecosystem services research is to develop a comprehensive methodological approach in which biophysical, socio-cultural and monetary value-domains can be explicitly considered and integrated into decision making processes. This paper operationalizes a methodological approach for ecosystem service assessment on the basis of value pluralism. We assessed eleven ecosystem services delivered in the Doñana social-ecological system (SW Spain). We found that different ecosystem service trade-offs came into view depending the value-domain in which services were assessed. The use of different valuation methods uncovers the fact that methods to elicit value actually shape and define the values being elicited. In this context, the prevalence of biophysical and monetary value-domains in scientific literature entails two main concerns: (1) the ecosystem service concept reflect in a limited extent the concerns of their beneficiaries, and (2) ecosystem service assessment results are biased towards the information provided by markets at the expense of other value-articulating institutions. Recognizing the role of ecosystem service assessment methods as value-articulating institutions, we call for a methodological framework able to contemplate the multidimensional nature of ecosystem services. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
KW - Indicators
KW - Quantitative evaluation
KW - Social-ecological system
KW - Trade-offs
KW - Value pluralism
KW - Value-articulating institutions
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84890038452
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.003
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.003
M3 - Article
SN - 1470-160X
VL - 37
SP - 220
EP - 228
JO - Ecological Indicators
JF - Ecological Indicators
IS - PART A
ER -