TY - JOUR
T1 - The diachronic syntax of negated adjuncts in English
AU - Ingham, Richard
AU - Tubau, Susagna
N1 - Acknowledgements:
This research has been funded by two research grants awarded by the Spanish Ministerio de Indústria, Economía y Competitividad (FFI2017-8254-P, FFI2016-81750-REDT), and by a grant awarded by the Generalitat de Catalunya to the Centre de Lingüística Teòrica (2017SGR634). We would like to thank three anonymous reviewers and the handling editor for comments and suggestions on how to improve the manuscript. All errors remain our own.
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - In this paper we investigate the diachronic changes in negation and Emphatic Focus that are responsible for the distribution of negated adjuncts in Present Day English. These can occur clause-medially and clause-initially, but generally not clause-finally. While clause-initial negated adjuncts move to the left-periphery triggering Negative Inversion for emphasis, clause-medial negated adjuncts are argued to occur in their first-merged position as vP-adjuncts. We relate the inability of clause-final negated adjuncts to express sentential negation to the loss of Prosodic-movement and Negative Concord in the transition from Late Middle English to Early Modern English. The eventual loss of Negative Concord is related to the reanalysis of negative words from non-negative (i.e. [uNeg]) to negative (i.e. [iNeg]). Upon loss of Prosodic-movement, reanalysis of negative words as [iNeg] results in the rise of Negative Inversion to express Focus.
AB - In this paper we investigate the diachronic changes in negation and Emphatic Focus that are responsible for the distribution of negated adjuncts in Present Day English. These can occur clause-medially and clause-initially, but generally not clause-finally. While clause-initial negated adjuncts move to the left-periphery triggering Negative Inversion for emphasis, clause-medial negated adjuncts are argued to occur in their first-merged position as vP-adjuncts. We relate the inability of clause-final negated adjuncts to express sentential negation to the loss of Prosodic-movement and Negative Concord in the transition from Late Middle English to Early Modern English. The eventual loss of Negative Concord is related to the reanalysis of negative words from non-negative (i.e. [uNeg]) to negative (i.e. [iNeg]). Upon loss of Prosodic-movement, reanalysis of negative words as [iNeg] results in the rise of Negative Inversion to express Focus.
KW - Focus
KW - Late Middle English
KW - Negated adjuncts
KW - Negative concord
KW - Negative inversion
KW - Prosodic-movement
KW - CONCORD
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/diachronic-syntax-negated-adjuncts-english
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/c1662070-1da6-30f1-8338-07f68aefc4fa/
UR - https://ddd.uab.cat/record/28770
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85064671275
U2 - 10.1007/s11049-019-09450-1
DO - 10.1007/s11049-019-09450-1
M3 - Article
SN - 0167-806X
VL - 38
SP - 477
EP - 497
JO - Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
JF - Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
IS - 2
ER -