TY - JOUR
T1 - Task-based pronunciation teaching
T2 - Lack of auditory precision but not memory hinders learning
AU - Xu, Jiying
AU - Saito, Kazuya
AU - Mora-Plaza, Ingrid
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - This study examined the impact of individual differences in perception and cognition on the effectiveness of task-based pronunciation teaching (TBPT). Seventy young adult Chinese speakers were randomly assigned to either an experimental or control group. The experimental group participated in a 30-min TBPT session, engaging in meaning-oriented tasks designed to help them notice and practice two English vocalic contrasts: [ɛ]-[æ] (e.g., “set” vs. “sat”) and [ɪ]-[i] (e.g., “sit” vs. “seat”). Participants’ learning patterns were then assessed based on their aptitude on perceptual (auditory processing) and cognitive (working memory) levels. Analysis of pre- and post-test results, conducted through forced-choice identification tasks, revealed significant improvements in vowel performance (approximately 10% gain), particularly among participants with normative auditory precision. However, the effectiveness of TBPT was limited among those with lower auditory precision. These findings highlight the negative impact of lower-order aptitude, specifically auditory processing, on the efficacy of TBPT.
AB - This study examined the impact of individual differences in perception and cognition on the effectiveness of task-based pronunciation teaching (TBPT). Seventy young adult Chinese speakers were randomly assigned to either an experimental or control group. The experimental group participated in a 30-min TBPT session, engaging in meaning-oriented tasks designed to help them notice and practice two English vocalic contrasts: [ɛ]-[æ] (e.g., “set” vs. “sat”) and [ɪ]-[i] (e.g., “sit” vs. “seat”). Participants’ learning patterns were then assessed based on their aptitude on perceptual (auditory processing) and cognitive (working memory) levels. Analysis of pre- and post-test results, conducted through forced-choice identification tasks, revealed significant improvements in vowel performance (approximately 10% gain), particularly among participants with normative auditory precision. However, the effectiveness of TBPT was limited among those with lower auditory precision. These findings highlight the negative impact of lower-order aptitude, specifically auditory processing, on the efficacy of TBPT.
KW - Auditory processing
KW - Individual differences
KW - Phonetic instruction
KW - Second language speech
KW - Task-based language teaching
KW - Working memory
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85208592429
U2 - 10.1016/j.system.2024.103532
DO - 10.1016/j.system.2024.103532
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85208592429
SN - 0346-251X
VL - 127
JO - System
JF - System
M1 - 103532
ER -