Symptomatic vs. non-symptomatic device-related thrombus after LAAC : a sub-analysis from the multicenter EUROC-DRT registry

Vivian Vij, Ignacio Cruz-González, Roberto Galea, Kerstin Piayda, Dominik Nelles, Lara Vogt, Steffen Gloekler, Monika Fürholz, Bernhard Meier, Lorenz Räber, Gilles O'Hara, Dabit Arzamendi, Victor Hugo Agudelo Montañez, Lluís Asmarats, Xavier Freixa, Eduardo Josué Flores Umanzor, Ole De Backer, Lars Sondergaard, Luís Nombela-Franco, Angela McInerneyPablo Salinas, Kasper Korsholm, Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk, Shazia Afzal, Tobias Zeus, Felix Operhalski, Boris Schmidt, Gilles Montalescot, Paul Guedeney, Xavier Iriart, Noelie Miton, Jacqueline Saw, Thomas Gilhofer, Laurent Fauchier, Egzon Veliqi, Felix Meincke, Nils Petri, Peter Nordbeck, Rocío Gonzalez Ferreiro, Deepak L. Bhatt, Alessandra Laricchia, Antonio Mangieri, Heyder Omran, Jan Wilko Schrickel, Josep Rodés-Cabau, Georg Nickenig, Horst Sievert, Alexander Sedaghat

Producció científica: Contribució a revistaArticleRecercaAvaluat per experts

6 Cites (Scopus)

Resum

Device-related thrombus (DRT) after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is associated with adverse outcomes, i.e. ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (SE). Data on predictors of stroke/SE in the context of DRT are limited. This study aimed to identify predisposing factors for stroke/SE in DRT patients. In addition, the temporal connection of stroke/SE to DRT diagnosis was analyzed. The EUROC-DRT registry included 176 patients, in whom DRT after LAAC were diagnosed. Patients with symptomatic DRT, defined as stroke/SE in the context of DRT diagnosis, were compared against patients with non-symptomatic DRT. Baseline characteristics, anti-thrombotic regimens, device position, and timing of stroke/SE were compared. Stroke/SE occurred in 25/176 (14.2%) patients diagnosed with DRT (symptomatic DRT). Stroke/SE occurred after a median of 198 days (IQR 37-558) after LAAC. In 45.8% stroke/SE occurred within one month before/after DRT diagnosis (DRT-related stroke). Patients with symptomatic DRT had lower left ventricular ejection fractions (50.0 ± 9.1% vs. 54.2 ± 11.0%, p = 0.03) and higher rates of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (84.0% vs. 64.9%, p = 0.06). Other baseline parameters and device positions were not different. Most ischemic events occurred among patients with single antiplatelet therapy (50%), however, stroke/SE was also observed under dual antiplatelet therapy (25%) or oral anticoagulation (20%). Stroke/SE are documented in 14.2% and occur both in close temporal relation to the DRT finding and chronologically independently therefrom. Identification of risk factors remains cumbersome, putting all DRT patients at substantial risk for stroke/SE. Further studies are necessary to minimize the risk of DRT and ischemic events. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].
Idioma originalAnglès
Pàgines (de-a)1790-1799
Nombre de pàgines10
RevistaClinical Research in Cardiology
Volum112
Número12
DOIs
Estat de la publicacióPublicada - 2023

Fingerprint

Navegar pels temes de recerca de 'Symptomatic vs. non-symptomatic device-related thrombus after LAAC : a sub-analysis from the multicenter EUROC-DRT registry'. Junts formen un fingerprint únic.

Com citar-ho