Subtotal colectomy versus left hemicolectomy for the elective treatment of splenic flexure colonic neoplasia

Marc Beisani, Francesc Vallribera, Albert García, Laura Mora, Sebastiano Biondo, Jaime Lopez-Borao, Ramon Farrés, Júlia Gil, Eloy Espin

Producció científica: Contribució a una revistaArticleRecercaAvaluat per experts

30 Cites (Scopus)

Resum

© 2017 Elsevier Inc. Background: Optimal elective surgical treatment for splenic flexure neoplasm (SFN) is unclear. Subtotal colectomy (STC) and left hemicolectomy (LHC) are the two more common strategies used. Methods: Observational multicentric study comparing postoperative morbidity, mortality and long-term survival on patients with SFN electively operated by STC versus LHC between 2003 and 2014. Results: After revision of the databases, 144 patients were included (STC group, n = 68; LHC group, n = 76). No differences were found on epidemiological and surgical data. A higher global morbidity (58%vs37%, p = 0.014), surgical morbidity (50%vs33%, p = 0.037), postoperative ileus (37%vs20%, p = 0.023) and harvested lymph nodes (26vs18, p = 0.0001) were found on the STC group. No significant differences in complications according to severity, reoperation rate, hospital stay, mortality, recurrence or long-term survival were found between groups. Conclusions: A higher surgical morbidity was found on the STC group, mainly due to mild postoperative ileus. No differences on long-term oncological results were found.
Idioma originalEnglish
Pàgines (de-a)251-254
RevistaAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volum216
Número2
DOIs
Estat de la publicacióPublicada - 1 d’ag. 2018

Fingerprint

Navegar pels temes de recerca de 'Subtotal colectomy versus left hemicolectomy for the elective treatment of splenic flexure colonic neoplasia'. Junts formen un fingerprint únic.

Com citar-ho