TY - JOUR
T1 - Spatial patterns and recent temporal trends in global transpiration modelled using eco-evolutionary optimality
AU - Li, Shijie
AU - Wang, Guojie
AU - Zhu, Chenxia
AU - Hannemann, Marco
AU - Poyatos, Rafael
AU - Lu, Jiao
AU - Li, Ji
AU - Ullah, Waheed
AU - Hagan, Daniel Fiifi Tawia
AU - García-García, Almudena
AU - Liu, Yi
AU - Liu, Qi
AU - Ma, Siyu
AU - Liu, Qiang
AU - Sun, Shanlei
AU - Zhao, Fujie
AU - Peng, Jian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2023/11/15
Y1 - 2023/11/15
N2 - Transpiration from vegetation accounts for about two thirds of land evapotranspiration (ET), and exerts important effects on of global water, energy, and carbon cycles. Resistance-based ET partitioning models using remote sensing data are one of the main methods to estimate global land transpiration, overcoming the limitation by the sparse distribution and short observation periods of site-level measurements. However, the uncertainties of estimated transpiration for these models mainly come from the resistance parameterization based on specific empirical parameters across different plant functional types (PFT). A model based on eco-evolutionary optimization (P model) has recently been proposed to simulate stomatal conductance without the need of calibrated parameters. Here, we calculated global long-term (1982–2018) monthly transpiration with the Penman-Monteith (PM) equation using canopy conductance estimated by the P model (PM-P) and Ball-Berry-Leuning model (PM-BBL). Using the observations of SAPFLUXNET and FLUXNET sites as reference, the performance of PM-P was comparable with that of PM-BBL and Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam model (GLEAM). Multi-year mean and trends in growing season transpiration estimated by GLEAM and the PM-P model revealed a similar spatial distribution globally. Both GLEAM and the PM-P model showed a widespread increasing trend of growing season transpiration over 72.06%∼80.38% of global land, especially for some main greening hotspots with >3.0 mm/year. The good performance of the P model indicated that it could avoid the uncertainties emerging from the resistance parameterization with too many empirical parameters and had the potential to accurately estimate global transpiration.
AB - Transpiration from vegetation accounts for about two thirds of land evapotranspiration (ET), and exerts important effects on of global water, energy, and carbon cycles. Resistance-based ET partitioning models using remote sensing data are one of the main methods to estimate global land transpiration, overcoming the limitation by the sparse distribution and short observation periods of site-level measurements. However, the uncertainties of estimated transpiration for these models mainly come from the resistance parameterization based on specific empirical parameters across different plant functional types (PFT). A model based on eco-evolutionary optimization (P model) has recently been proposed to simulate stomatal conductance without the need of calibrated parameters. Here, we calculated global long-term (1982–2018) monthly transpiration with the Penman-Monteith (PM) equation using canopy conductance estimated by the P model (PM-P) and Ball-Berry-Leuning model (PM-BBL). Using the observations of SAPFLUXNET and FLUXNET sites as reference, the performance of PM-P was comparable with that of PM-BBL and Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam model (GLEAM). Multi-year mean and trends in growing season transpiration estimated by GLEAM and the PM-P model revealed a similar spatial distribution globally. Both GLEAM and the PM-P model showed a widespread increasing trend of growing season transpiration over 72.06%∼80.38% of global land, especially for some main greening hotspots with >3.0 mm/year. The good performance of the P model indicated that it could avoid the uncertainties emerging from the resistance parameterization with too many empirical parameters and had the potential to accurately estimate global transpiration.
KW - Ball-Berry-Leuning model
KW - P model
KW - Penman-Monteith
KW - Transpiration
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85171378742
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/fe02b620-ea94-3ecf-9749-1432f1e15f1c/
U2 - 10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109702
DO - 10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109702
M3 - Article
SN - 1873-2240
VL - 342
JO - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
JF - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
IS - 15
M1 - 109702
ER -