Spanish Results of the Second European Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey (CRT-Survey II)

Óscar Cano, Alejandro Bellver, Adolfo Fontenla, Roger Villuendas, Pablo Peñafiel, Jaume Francisco-Pascual, José Luis Ibáñez, Vicente Bertomeu-González, Lorena García-Riesco, Javier García-Seara, Ángel Martínez-Brotons, David Calvo, Bieito Campos, José Enero, Antonio Peláez, José Martínez-Ferrer, Francisco Mazuelos, José Luis Moriñigo, Carmen Expósito, Ángel ArenalMarta Pombo, Federico Segura, Agustín Pastor, Fernando Pérez, Ignacio Fernández-Lozano, Juan José González-Ferrer, Sara Moreno, Julia Martín-Fernández, José Ormaetxe, Ricardo Pavón, José María Tolosana, Jordi Mercé, Francisco-José García-Almagro, Miguel Álvarez, Alfonso Macías, Rafael Peinado, Cecilia Linde, Camilla Normand, Kenneth Dickstein

Producció científica: Contribució a revistaArticleRecercaAvaluat per experts

4 Cites (Scopus)

Resum

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: We describe the results for Spain of the Second European Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey (CRT-Survey II) and compare them with those of the other participating countries.

METHODS: We included patients undergoing CRT device implantation between October 2015 and December 2016 in 36 participating Spanish centers. We registered the patients' baseline characteristics, implant procedure data, and short-term follow-up information until hospital discharge.

RESULTS: Implant success was achieved in 95.9%. The median [interquartile range] annual implantation rate by center was significantly lower in Spain than in the other participating countries: 30 implants/y [21-50] vs 55 implants/y [33-100]; P=.00003. In Spanish centers, there was a lower proportion of patients ≥ 75 years (27.9% vs 32.4%; P=.0071), a higher proportion in New York Heart Association functional class II (46.9% vs 36.9%; P <.00001), and a higher percentage with electrocardiographic criteria of left bundle branch block (82.9% vs 74.6%; P <.00001). The mean length of hospital stay was significantly lower in Spanish centers (5.8±8.5 days vs 6.4±11.6; P <.00001). Spanish patients were more likely to receive a quadripolar LV lead (74% vs 56%; P <.00001) and to be followed up by remote monitoring (55.8% vs 27.7%; P <.00001).

CONCLUSIONS: The CRT-Survey II shows that, compared with other participating countries, fewer patients in Spain aged ≥ 75 years received a CRT device, while more patients were in New York Heart Association functional class II and had left bundle branch block. In addition, the length of hospital stay was shorter, and there was greater use of quadripolar LV leads and remote CRT monitoring.

Títol traduït de la contribucióResultados en España de la encuesta de la Sociedad Europea de Cardiología sobre terapia de resincronización cardiaca (CRT-Survey II)
Idioma originalAnglès
Pàgines (de-a)1020-1030
Nombre de pàgines11
RevistaRevista espanola de cardiologia (English ed.)
Volum72
Número12
DOIs
Estat de la publicacióPublicada - de des. 2019

Fingerprint

Navegar pels temes de recerca de 'Spanish Results of the Second European Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey (CRT-Survey II)'. Junts formen un fingerprint únic.

Com citar-ho