TY - JOUR
T1 - Spanish Results of the Second European Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey (CRT-Survey II)
AU - Cano, Óscar
AU - Bellver, Alejandro
AU - Fontenla, Adolfo
AU - Villuendas, Roger
AU - Peñafiel, Pablo
AU - Francisco-Pascual, Jaume
AU - Ibáñez, José Luis
AU - Bertomeu-González, Vicente
AU - García-Riesco, Lorena
AU - García-Seara, Javier
AU - Martínez-Brotons, Ángel
AU - Calvo, David
AU - Campos, Bieito
AU - Enero, José
AU - Peláez, Antonio
AU - Martínez-Ferrer, José
AU - Mazuelos, Francisco
AU - Moriñigo, José Luis
AU - Expósito, Carmen
AU - Arenal, Ángel
AU - Pombo, Marta
AU - Segura, Federico
AU - Pastor, Agustín
AU - Pérez, Fernando
AU - Fernández-Lozano, Ignacio
AU - González-Ferrer, Juan José
AU - Moreno, Sara
AU - Martín-Fernández, Julia
AU - Ormaetxe, José
AU - Pavón, Ricardo
AU - Tolosana, José María
AU - Mercé, Jordi
AU - García-Almagro, Francisco-José
AU - Álvarez, Miguel
AU - Macías, Alfonso
AU - Peinado, Rafael
AU - Linde, Cecilia
AU - Normand, Camilla
AU - Dickstein, Kenneth
N1 - Copyright © 2018 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/12
Y1 - 2019/12
N2 - INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: We describe the results for Spain of the Second European Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey (CRT-Survey II) and compare them with those of the other participating countries.METHODS: We included patients undergoing CRT device implantation between October 2015 and December 2016 in 36 participating Spanish centers. We registered the patients' baseline characteristics, implant procedure data, and short-term follow-up information until hospital discharge.RESULTS: Implant success was achieved in 95.9%. The median [interquartile range] annual implantation rate by center was significantly lower in Spain than in the other participating countries: 30 implants/y [21-50] vs 55 implants/y [33-100]; P=.00003. In Spanish centers, there was a lower proportion of patients ≥ 75 years (27.9% vs 32.4%; P=.0071), a higher proportion in New York Heart Association functional class II (46.9% vs 36.9%; P <.00001), and a higher percentage with electrocardiographic criteria of left bundle branch block (82.9% vs 74.6%; P <.00001). The mean length of hospital stay was significantly lower in Spanish centers (5.8±8.5 days vs 6.4±11.6; P <.00001). Spanish patients were more likely to receive a quadripolar LV lead (74% vs 56%; P <.00001) and to be followed up by remote monitoring (55.8% vs 27.7%; P <.00001).CONCLUSIONS: The CRT-Survey II shows that, compared with other participating countries, fewer patients in Spain aged ≥ 75 years received a CRT device, while more patients were in New York Heart Association functional class II and had left bundle branch block. In addition, the length of hospital stay was shorter, and there was greater use of quadripolar LV leads and remote CRT monitoring.
AB - INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: We describe the results for Spain of the Second European Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey (CRT-Survey II) and compare them with those of the other participating countries.METHODS: We included patients undergoing CRT device implantation between October 2015 and December 2016 in 36 participating Spanish centers. We registered the patients' baseline characteristics, implant procedure data, and short-term follow-up information until hospital discharge.RESULTS: Implant success was achieved in 95.9%. The median [interquartile range] annual implantation rate by center was significantly lower in Spain than in the other participating countries: 30 implants/y [21-50] vs 55 implants/y [33-100]; P=.00003. In Spanish centers, there was a lower proportion of patients ≥ 75 years (27.9% vs 32.4%; P=.0071), a higher proportion in New York Heart Association functional class II (46.9% vs 36.9%; P <.00001), and a higher percentage with electrocardiographic criteria of left bundle branch block (82.9% vs 74.6%; P <.00001). The mean length of hospital stay was significantly lower in Spanish centers (5.8±8.5 days vs 6.4±11.6; P <.00001). Spanish patients were more likely to receive a quadripolar LV lead (74% vs 56%; P <.00001) and to be followed up by remote monitoring (55.8% vs 27.7%; P <.00001).CONCLUSIONS: The CRT-Survey II shows that, compared with other participating countries, fewer patients in Spain aged ≥ 75 years received a CRT device, while more patients were in New York Heart Association functional class II and had left bundle branch block. In addition, the length of hospital stay was shorter, and there was greater use of quadripolar LV leads and remote CRT monitoring.
KW - Heart failure
KW - Cardiac resynchronization therapy
KW - Humans
KW - Insuficiencia cardiaca
KW - Terapia de resincronización cardiaca
U2 - 10.1016/j.rec.2019.02.003
DO - 10.1016/j.rec.2019.02.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 30935899
SN - 1885-5857
VL - 72
SP - 1020
EP - 1030
JO - Revista espanola de cardiologia (English ed.)
JF - Revista espanola de cardiologia (English ed.)
IS - 12
ER -