TY - JOUR
T1 - Social Impact Bonds
T2 - The Role of Private Capital in Outcome-based Commissioning
AU - Edmiston , Daniel
AU - Nicholls, Alex
N1 - This research was supported by the EU FP7 project ‘Creating Economic Space for Social Innovation’ (grant agreement no 613261). Versions of this paper were presented at the UK Social Policy Association Conference 2016 in Belfast; the International Social Innovation Research Conference 2016 in Glasgow; the EUCLID Summit 2016 in Zagreb; and the ‘Widening Perspectives on Social Impact Bond’ Conference 2016 in London. The authors are grateful for the generous feedback and input received from delegates during these events and to the two anonymous referees for their comments on earlier versions of this paper.
PY - 2017/4/4
Y1 - 2017/4/4
N2 - Social impact bonds are payment by results contracts that leverage private social investment to cover the up-front expenditure associated with welfare services. The introduction of private principles and actors through outcome-based commissioning has received a great deal of attention in social policy research. However, there has been much less attention given to the introduction of private capital and its relation to more established forms of quasi-marketisation. This paper examines what effect private social investment has on outcome-based commissioning and whether the alternative forms of performance measurement and management, that social impact bonds bring to bear on service operations, demonstrate the capacity to engender: innovation in service delivery; improved social outcomes; future cost savings; and additionality. This paper draws on an in-depth study of four social impact bonds in the UK context, as the welfare regime at the vanguard of this policy development. The findings suggest that the introduction of private capital in outcome-based commissioning has had a number of unique and unintended effects on service providers, operations and outcomes. The paper concludes by considering whether social impact bonds represent a risk or an opportunity for public service reform both in the UK and further afield.
AB - Social impact bonds are payment by results contracts that leverage private social investment to cover the up-front expenditure associated with welfare services. The introduction of private principles and actors through outcome-based commissioning has received a great deal of attention in social policy research. However, there has been much less attention given to the introduction of private capital and its relation to more established forms of quasi-marketisation. This paper examines what effect private social investment has on outcome-based commissioning and whether the alternative forms of performance measurement and management, that social impact bonds bring to bear on service operations, demonstrate the capacity to engender: innovation in service delivery; improved social outcomes; future cost savings; and additionality. This paper draws on an in-depth study of four social impact bonds in the UK context, as the welfare regime at the vanguard of this policy development. The findings suggest that the introduction of private capital in outcome-based commissioning has had a number of unique and unintended effects on service providers, operations and outcomes. The paper concludes by considering whether social impact bonds represent a risk or an opportunity for public service reform both in the UK and further afield.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85017154263
U2 - 10.1017/s0047279417000125
DO - 10.1017/s0047279417000125
M3 - Article
SN - 0047-2794
VL - 47
SP - 57
EP - 76
JO - Journal of Social Policy
JF - Journal of Social Policy
IS - 1
ER -