@techreport{917d7eeeaa4e413e861c7c923fe21d46,
title = "Domains, ranges and strategy-proofness: the case of single-dipped preferences",
abstract = "We characterize the set of all individual and group strategy-proof rules on the domain of all single-dipped preferences on a line. For rules defined on this domain, and on several of its subdomains, we explore the implications of these strategy-proofness requirements on the maximum size of the rules{\textquoteright} range. We show that when all single-dipped preferences are admissible, the range must contain two alternatives at most. But this bound changes as we consider different subclasses of single-dipped preferences: we provide examples of subdomains admitting strategy-proof rules with larger ranges. We establish exact bounds on the maximal size of strategy-proof functions on each of these domains, and prove that the relationship between the sizes of the subdomains and those of the ranges of strategy-proof functions on them need not be monotonic. Our results exhibit a sharp contrast between the structure of strategy-proof rules defined on subdomains of single-dipped preferences and those defined on subsets of single-peaked ones",
keywords = "Social Choice, Econ Theory, Social Choice Function, Proof Rule, Binary Range",
author = "S. Barber{\`a} and D. Berga and B. Moreno",
year = "2009",
month = dec,
day = "31",
language = "English",
series = "BSE Working Papers",
publisher = "BSE Working Papers",
number = "418",
address = "Spain",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "BSE Working Papers",
}