Short-Acting Beta-2-Agonist Exposure and Severe Asthma Exacerbations: SABINA Findings From Europe and North America

Jennifer K. Quint, Sofie Arnetorp, Janwillem W. H. Kocks, Maciej Kupczyk, Javier Nuevo, Vicente Plaza, Claudia Cabrera, Chantal Raherison-Semjen, Brandie Walker, Erika Penz, Ileen Gilbert, Njira Lucia Lugogo, Ralf J. P. van der Valk

Producció científica: Contribució a revistaArticleRecercaAvaluat per experts

58 Cites (Scopus)

Resum

BACKGROUND: Expert national/global asthma management recommendations raise the issue whether a safe threshold of short-acting beta-2 agonist (SABA) use without concomitant inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) exists.OBJECTIVE: To examine SABA and maintenance therapy associations with severe asthma exacerbations across North America and Europe.METHODS: Observational analyses of 10 SABa use IN Asthma (SABINA) datasets involving 1,033,564 patients (>= 12 y) from Canada, France, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Negative binomial models (incidence rate ratio [IRR] [95% CI adjusted for prespecifiedcovariates]) evaluated associations between SABA and exacerbations.Results: Across severities, 40.2% of patients were prescribed/possessed 3 or more SABA canisters/y. Per the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2018 definitions, steps 3 to 5-treated patients prescribed/possessing 3 or more versus 1 or 2 SABAs experienced more severe exacerbations (IRR 1.08 [95% CI 1.04-1.13], U.S. Medicare; IRR 2.11 [95% CI 1.96-2.27], Poland). This association was not observed in all step 1 or 2-treated patients (the Netherlands, IRR 1.25 [95% CI 0.91-1.71]; U.S. commercial, IRR 0.92 [95% CI 0.91-0.93]; U.S. Medicare, IRR 0.74 [95% CI 0.71-0.76]). We hypothesize that this inverse association between SABA and severe exacerbations in the U.S. datasets was attributable to the large patient population possessing fewer than 3 SABA and no maintenance therapy and receiving oral corticosteroid bursts without face-to-face health care provider encounters. In U.S. SABA monotherapy-treated patients, 3 or more SABAs were associated with more emergency/outpatient visits and hospitalizations (IRR 1.31 [95% CI 1.29-1.34]). Most GINA 2 to 5-treated study patients (60.6%) did not have maintenance therapy for up to 50% of the time; however, the association of 3 or more SABAs and severe exacerbations persisted (IRR 1.32 [95% CI 1.18-1.49]) after excluding these patients and the independent effect was further confirmed when U.K. SABA data were analyzed as a continuous variable in patients with up to 100% annual coverage for ICS-containing medications.Conclusions: Increasing SABA exposure is associated with severe exacerbation risk, independent of maintenance therapy. As addressed by GINA, based on studies across asthma severities where as-needed fast-acting bronchodilators with concomitant ICS decrease severe exacerbations compared with SABA, our findings highlight the importance of avoiding a rescue/reliever paradigm utilizing SABA monotherapy. (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology.
Idioma originalEspanyol
Pàgines (de-a)2297-2309
Nombre de pàgines13
RevistaJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
Volum10
Número9
DOIs
Estat de la publicacióPublicada - de set. 2022

Paraules clau

  • Asthma
  • Asthma management
  • Short-acting beta-2 agonists
  • Inhaled corticosteroids
  • Severe exacerbations

Com citar-ho