Roman retention of title clauses as retention of possession

Jakob Fortunat Stagl*

*Autor corresponent d’aquest treball

Producció científica: Contribució a revistaArticleRecercaAvaluat per experts

1 Citació (Scopus)

Resum

Roman retention of title clauses as retention of possession. It is the dominant view that Roman law did not know retention of title clauses (pactum reservati dominii) which is, accordingly, considered to be an invention of the medieval ius commune. This opinion is true to the extent that retention of title was inefficient from the Roman point of view because the buyer as possessor was always in the position of acquiring ownership by acquisitive prescription (usucapio), the requirement of good faith being met in these instances. The Roman lawyers, therefore, devised different means to make sure that the buyer would get the use of the sold good (detentio) without becoming possessor thus preventing the dreaded usucapio. This 'retention of possession' (Besitzvorbehalt) is the Roman functional equivalent to modern retention of title.
Idioma originalAnglès
Pàgines (de-a)181-200
Nombre de pàgines20
RevistaZeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung fur Rechtsgeschichte, Kanonistische Abteilung
Volum101
Número1
Estat de la publicacióPublicada - 1 d’ag. 2015

Fingerprint

Navegar pels temes de recerca de 'Roman retention of title clauses as retention of possession'. Junts formen un fingerprint únic.

Com citar-ho