TY - JOUR
T1 - Robot-assisted Extraperitoneal Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy Is Associated with Fewer Surgical Complications
T2 - A Post Hoc Analysis of the STELLA-2 Randomized Trial
AU - Bebia, Vicente
AU - Gil-Moreno, Antonio
AU - Hernández, Alicia
AU - Gilabert-Estellés, Juan
AU - Franco-Camps, Silvia
AU - de la Torre, Javier
AU - Siegrist, Jaime
AU - Chipirliu, Anca
AU - Cabrera, Silvia
AU - Bradbury, Melissa
AU - Pérez-Benavente, Assumpció
AU - Díaz-Feijoo, Berta
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 AAGL
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Study Objective: To evaluate if extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PALND) using a robot-assisted approach was associated with fewer complications than all other approaches (conventional laparoscopic transperitoneal or extraperitoneal and robot-assisted transperitoneal) without compromising lymph node yield, operative time, or length of stay. Design: Post hoc analysis of the prospective randomized open-label multicenter trial (STELLA-2). Setting: Three academic referral hospitals. Patients: Two hundred and three eligible patients from the STELLA-2 trial were included. Interventions: The patients were randomized to extraperitoneal or transperitoneal PALND using a minimally invasive approach (either laparoscopic or robot-assisted) for surgical staging of endometrial or ovarian cancer. The minimally invasive approaches were not subjected to randomization. Measurements and Main Results: The primary end point was evaluated through a composite variable that included at least 1 of the following events: blood loss ≥500 mL during PALND, any intraoperative complication related to PALND, severe postoperative complication (Clavien-Dindo ≥grade IIIA), impossibility of completing the procedure, or conversion to laparotomy. Of the 203 patients analyzed, 68 were assigned to the extraperitoneal laparoscopic group (X-L), 62 to the transperitoneal laparoscopic group (T-L), 35 to the extraperitoneal robotic group (X-R), and 38 to the transperitoneal robotic group (T-R). A reduced trend in complications was observed in the extraperitoneal robot-assisted arm when considering the primary end point (X-L: 25.0%, T-L: 24.2%, X-R: 5.7%, T-R: 28.9%; p =.073). In a multivariable analysis, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00–1.09), body mass index (OR 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03–1.16), and waist-to-hip ratio (OR 1.66; 95% CI, 1.12–2.47) were found to independently increase the risk of PALND complications, whereas the extraperitoneal robotic approach (OR 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02–0.64) was an independent protective factor for complication occurrence. Conclusion: Robot-assisted extraperitoneal PALND is associated with fewer surgical complications, without compromising lymph node retrieval, operative time, or length of stay. Robot-enhanced 3D visualization, surgeon ergonomics, or hemostatic precision could explain our results.
AB - Study Objective: To evaluate if extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PALND) using a robot-assisted approach was associated with fewer complications than all other approaches (conventional laparoscopic transperitoneal or extraperitoneal and robot-assisted transperitoneal) without compromising lymph node yield, operative time, or length of stay. Design: Post hoc analysis of the prospective randomized open-label multicenter trial (STELLA-2). Setting: Three academic referral hospitals. Patients: Two hundred and three eligible patients from the STELLA-2 trial were included. Interventions: The patients were randomized to extraperitoneal or transperitoneal PALND using a minimally invasive approach (either laparoscopic or robot-assisted) for surgical staging of endometrial or ovarian cancer. The minimally invasive approaches were not subjected to randomization. Measurements and Main Results: The primary end point was evaluated through a composite variable that included at least 1 of the following events: blood loss ≥500 mL during PALND, any intraoperative complication related to PALND, severe postoperative complication (Clavien-Dindo ≥grade IIIA), impossibility of completing the procedure, or conversion to laparotomy. Of the 203 patients analyzed, 68 were assigned to the extraperitoneal laparoscopic group (X-L), 62 to the transperitoneal laparoscopic group (T-L), 35 to the extraperitoneal robotic group (X-R), and 38 to the transperitoneal robotic group (T-R). A reduced trend in complications was observed in the extraperitoneal robot-assisted arm when considering the primary end point (X-L: 25.0%, T-L: 24.2%, X-R: 5.7%, T-R: 28.9%; p =.073). In a multivariable analysis, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00–1.09), body mass index (OR 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03–1.16), and waist-to-hip ratio (OR 1.66; 95% CI, 1.12–2.47) were found to independently increase the risk of PALND complications, whereas the extraperitoneal robotic approach (OR 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02–0.64) was an independent protective factor for complication occurrence. Conclusion: Robot-assisted extraperitoneal PALND is associated with fewer surgical complications, without compromising lymph node retrieval, operative time, or length of stay. Robot-enhanced 3D visualization, surgeon ergonomics, or hemostatic precision could explain our results.
KW - Minimally invasive
KW - Morbidity
KW - Robotic
KW - Staging
KW - Minimally invasive
KW - Morbidity
KW - Robotic
KW - Staging
KW - Minimally invasive
KW - Morbidity
KW - Robotic
KW - Staging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108573591&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.05.009
DO - 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.05.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 34022445
AN - SCOPUS:85108573591
SN - 1553-4650
VL - 28
SP - 2004-2012.e1
JO - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
JF - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
IS - 12
ER -