TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and postoperative outcomes after total and subtotal colectomy
T2 - A nationwide retrospective cohort study (RIALTCOT Study Collaborative Group)
AU - Ocaña, Juan
AU - Pastor, Paula
AU - Timoteo, Ander
AU - Diez-Alonso, Manuel Mariano
AU - de la Portilla, Fernando
AU - Cagigas, Carmen
AU - Labalde-Martínez, María
AU - Espin, Eloy
AU - Dujovne, Paula
AU - Nieto, Marta
AU - González, Manuel
AU - Sanz, Rodrigo
AU - Pascual, Marta
AU - Aguirre-Allende, Ignacio
AU - Cervera, Jorge
AU - Jiménez-Carneros, Virginia
AU - Guadalajara, Hector
AU - García-Granero, Alvaro
AU - Fernández-Cebrián, José María
AU - Die-Trill, Javier
AU - García-Pérez, Juan Carlos
AU - Pino, Oriol
AU - Vigorita, Vincenzo
AU - Serralta, Daniel
AU - Peña, Emilio
AU - Pascual, Isabel
AU - Blanco-Antonia, Francisco
AU - Cortina-Oliva, Francisco Javier
AU - Rodríguez-Sánchez, Anra
AU - de Quirós, Jaiver Morales Bernaldo
AU - Cornejo, Lidia
AU - Vera, Cristina
AU - Pintor-Tortolero, José
AU - Gómez, Marcos
AU - Vivas, Alfredo
AU - Ferrero-Herrero, Eduardo
AU - Kraft, Miquel
AU - Pellino, Gianluca
AU - Rodríguez-Martín, Marcos
AU - Sancho-Muriel, Jorge
AU - Frasson, Matteo
AU - Noguera, José
AU - Camarero, Enrique
AU - Guerrero, María Alejandra
AU - Etxart, Ane
AU - González, José María
AU - Gacía-Olmo, Damián
AU - Leon, Miguel
AU - Fernandez, Laura
AU - Coll, Magdalena
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
PY - 2022/11/9
Y1 - 2022/11/9
N2 - Aim: Anastomotic leakage (AL) following ileorectal (IRA) or ileosigmoid (ISA) anastomosis is associated with a high morbidity. The identification of potential risk factors for AL could change operative planning and reduce further complications. This study assesses the rate, potential risk factors and management of AL after total colectomy (TC) and subtotal colectomy (STC). Methods: A nationwide, multicentre, retrospective cohort study involved 26 Spanish referral centres. It included TC and STC with IRA or ISA patients between January 2013 and December 2020. Clinical data, primary surgery and complications were collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis to identify risk factors for AL were performed. Management of Grade B–C AL and permanent stoma rate was assessed according to revisional surgeries. Results: The study included 1074 patients, 433 ISA group (40.3%) and 641 IRA group (59.7%). The overall incidence of AL was 14.3% with no differences between IRA and ISA (14.2% and 14.5% respectively), P = 0.871. Male sex, ASA score and lower total preoperative proteins were identified as independent risk factors for global and Grade B–C AL. Diverting ileostomy did not protect against AL (P = 0.084). Clavien–Dindo ≥IIIA complication was found in 251 patients (23.3%). Stoma reversal was not possible in 85 patients (8.1%), being more frequent after anastomosis excision and terminal ileostomy in AL Grade C. Conclusion: Total colectomy and STC with IRA or ISA are high-risk procedures with an increased AL rate. Male sex, ASA score and lower preoperative protein level were associated with global AL and AL Grade B and C. A lower permanent stoma rate could be obtained when diverting ileostomy is performed in revision surgery.
AB - Aim: Anastomotic leakage (AL) following ileorectal (IRA) or ileosigmoid (ISA) anastomosis is associated with a high morbidity. The identification of potential risk factors for AL could change operative planning and reduce further complications. This study assesses the rate, potential risk factors and management of AL after total colectomy (TC) and subtotal colectomy (STC). Methods: A nationwide, multicentre, retrospective cohort study involved 26 Spanish referral centres. It included TC and STC with IRA or ISA patients between January 2013 and December 2020. Clinical data, primary surgery and complications were collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis to identify risk factors for AL were performed. Management of Grade B–C AL and permanent stoma rate was assessed according to revisional surgeries. Results: The study included 1074 patients, 433 ISA group (40.3%) and 641 IRA group (59.7%). The overall incidence of AL was 14.3% with no differences between IRA and ISA (14.2% and 14.5% respectively), P = 0.871. Male sex, ASA score and lower total preoperative proteins were identified as independent risk factors for global and Grade B–C AL. Diverting ileostomy did not protect against AL (P = 0.084). Clavien–Dindo ≥IIIA complication was found in 251 patients (23.3%). Stoma reversal was not possible in 85 patients (8.1%), being more frequent after anastomosis excision and terminal ileostomy in AL Grade C. Conclusion: Total colectomy and STC with IRA or ISA are high-risk procedures with an increased AL rate. Male sex, ASA score and lower preoperative protein level were associated with global AL and AL Grade B and C. A lower permanent stoma rate could be obtained when diverting ileostomy is performed in revision surgery.
KW - anastomotic leakage
KW - ileorectal anastomosis
KW - ileosigmoid anastomosis
KW - risk factors
KW - subtotal colectomy
KW - total colectomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141871867&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/codi.16384
DO - 10.1111/codi.16384
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85141871867
SN - 1462-8910
JO - Colorectal Disease
JF - Colorectal Disease
ER -