Reporting a program evaluation: Needs, program plan, intervention, and decisions

Susana Sanduvete Chaves, Mariona Portell Vidal, M. Teresa Anguera Argilaga, Salvador Chacón Moscosoa

Producció científica: Contribució a revistaArticleRecercaAvaluat per experts

40 Citacions (Web of Science)

Resum

The approach to intervention programs varies depending on the methodological perspective adopted. This means that health professionals lack clear guidelines regarding how best to proceed, and it hinders the accumulation of knowledge. The aim of this paper is to set out the essential and common aspects that should be included in any program evaluation report, thereby providing a useful guide for the professional regardless of the procedural approach used. Furthermore, the paper seeks to integrate the different methodologies and illustrate their complementarity, this being a key aspect in terms of real intervention contexts, which are constantly changing. The aspects to be included are presented in relation to the main stages of the evaluation process: needs, objectives and design (prior to the intervention), implementation (during the intervention), and outcomes (after the intervention). For each of these stages the paper describes the elements on which decisions should be based, highlighting the role of empirical evidence gathered through the application of instruments to defined samples and according to a given procedure. © 2012 Asociación Española de Psicología Conductual.
Idioma originalAnglès
Pàgines (de-a)58-66
RevistaInternational Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology
Volum13
Número1
Estat de la publicacióPublicada - 1 de gen. 2013

Fingerprint

Navegar pels temes de recerca de 'Reporting a program evaluation: Needs, program plan, intervention, and decisions'. Junts formen un fingerprint únic.

Com citar-ho