Reclamación por venta de perro de distinta raza, vicios ocultos y otros : comentario a la Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona, Sección 16ª, de 9 de abril de 2013

Producció científica: Contribució a una revistaArticleRecercaAvaluat per experts

Resum

The commented sentence has its origin in the lawsuit brought by the buyer of a supposed toy poodle dog against the store that sold the dog. The claimant sued the store for compensation because the dog was not of that breed and it had not been registered in the Spanish Book of Origins, as well as payment for hidden defects, for the veterinary treatment that the dog had to undergo in the weeks after its purchase. The sentence by the Provincial Audience agreed in part with the appeal, overturning part of the lower court sentence.
Títol traduït de la contribucióCivil Suit for sale of dog of a different breed, hidden defects and others :: commentary of the Sentence by the Provincial Audience of Barcelona, 16th Section, 9 April 2013
Idioma originalSpanish
RevistaDerecho Animal
Volum5
Número2
DOIs
Estat de la publicacióPublicada - 2014

Fingerprint

Navegar pels temes de recerca de 'Reclamación por venta de perro de distinta raza, vicios ocultos y otros : comentario a la Sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona, Sección 16ª, de 9 de abril de 2013'. Junts formen un fingerprint únic.

Com citar-ho