TY - JOUR
T1 - Prospective diagnostic performance evaluation of single-voxel 1H MRS for typing and grading of brain tumours
AU - Julià-Sapé, Margarida
AU - Coronel, Indira
AU - Majós, Carles
AU - Candiota, Ana Paula
AU - Serrallonga, Marta
AU - Cos, Mònica
AU - Aguilera, Carles
AU - Acebes, Juan José
AU - Griffiths, John R.
AU - Arús, Carles
PY - 2012/4/1
Y1 - 2012/4/1
N2 - The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether single-voxel 1H MRS could add useful information to conventional MRI in the preoperative characterisation of the type and grade of brain tumours. MRI and MRS examinations from a prospective cohort of 40 consecutive patients were analysed double blind by radiologists and spectroscopists before the histological diagnosis was known. The spectroscopists had only the MR spectra, whereas the radiologists had both the MR images and basic clinical details (age, sex and presenting symptoms). Then, the radiologists and spectroscopists exchanged their predictions and re-evaluated their initial opinions, taking into account the new evidence. Spectroscopists used four different systems of analysis for 1H MRS data, and the efficacy of each of these methods was also evaluated. Information extracted from 1H MRS significantly improved the radiologists' MRI-based characterisation of grade IV tumours (glioblastomas, metastases, medulloblastomas and lymphomas) in the cohort [area under the curve (AUC) in the MRI re-evaluation 0.93 versus AUC in the MRI evaluation 0.85], and also of the less malignant glial tumours (AUC in the MRI re-evaluation 0.93 versus AUC in the MRI evaluation 0.81). One of the MRS analysis systems used, the INTERPRET (International Network for Pattern Recognition of Tumours Using Magnetic Resonance) decision support system, outperformed the others, as well as being better than the MRI evaluation for the characterisation of grade III astrocytomas. Thus, preoperative MRS data improve the radiologists' performance in diagnosing grade IV tumours and, for those of grade II-III, MRS data help them to recognise the glial lineage. Even in cases in which their diagnoses were not improved, the provision of MRS data to the radiologists had no negative influence on their predictions. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
AB - The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether single-voxel 1H MRS could add useful information to conventional MRI in the preoperative characterisation of the type and grade of brain tumours. MRI and MRS examinations from a prospective cohort of 40 consecutive patients were analysed double blind by radiologists and spectroscopists before the histological diagnosis was known. The spectroscopists had only the MR spectra, whereas the radiologists had both the MR images and basic clinical details (age, sex and presenting symptoms). Then, the radiologists and spectroscopists exchanged their predictions and re-evaluated their initial opinions, taking into account the new evidence. Spectroscopists used four different systems of analysis for 1H MRS data, and the efficacy of each of these methods was also evaluated. Information extracted from 1H MRS significantly improved the radiologists' MRI-based characterisation of grade IV tumours (glioblastomas, metastases, medulloblastomas and lymphomas) in the cohort [area under the curve (AUC) in the MRI re-evaluation 0.93 versus AUC in the MRI evaluation 0.85], and also of the less malignant glial tumours (AUC in the MRI re-evaluation 0.93 versus AUC in the MRI evaluation 0.81). One of the MRS analysis systems used, the INTERPRET (International Network for Pattern Recognition of Tumours Using Magnetic Resonance) decision support system, outperformed the others, as well as being better than the MRI evaluation for the characterisation of grade III astrocytomas. Thus, preoperative MRS data improve the radiologists' performance in diagnosing grade IV tumours and, for those of grade II-III, MRS data help them to recognise the glial lineage. Even in cases in which their diagnoses were not improved, the provision of MRS data to the radiologists had no negative influence on their predictions. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
KW - Brain neoplasms
KW - Diagnosis, computer-assisted
KW - Diagnostic techniques and procedures
KW - MRI
KW - MRS
KW - Receiver operating characteristic curve
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858860261&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/nbm.1782
DO - 10.1002/nbm.1782
M3 - Article
C2 - 21954036
SN - 0952-3480
VL - 25
SP - 661
EP - 673
JO - NMR in Biomedicine
JF - NMR in Biomedicine
IS - 4
ER -