TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic impact of log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in the stratification of patients with rectal cancer
AU - Vigorita, Vincenzo
AU - Cano-Valderrama, Oscar
AU - Sánchez-Santos, Raquel
AU - Paniagua-Garcia-Señorans, Marta
AU - Moncada, Enrique
AU - Pellino, Gianluca
AU - Paredes-Cotoré, Jesús
AU - Casal, Enrique
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 AEC
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Introduction: The use of the N category of the TNM staging system, lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in predicting overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with rectal cancer is still controversial. Material and methods: A retrospective study of 445 patients with rectal cancer who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2017 in the University Complex Hospital of Vigo was performed. Patients were stratified according to number of lymph nodes examined (NLNE), N staging, LNR and LODDS. The analysis was performed using the log-rank test, Kaplan-Meier functions, Cox regression and ROC curves. Results: Five-year OS and DFS were 73.7% and 62.5%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed depending on NLNE. Increased LNR and LODDS were associated with shorter OS and DFS, independently of NLNE. Multivariate analysis showed that N stage, LNR and LODDS were independently associated with OS and DFS; however, the LODDS system obtained the best area under the curve, with greater predictive capacity for OS (AUC: 0.679) and DFS (AUC: 0.711). Conclusion: LODDS and LNR give prognostic information that is not related to NLNE. LODDS provides better prognostic accuracy in patients with negative nodes than LNR and N stage.
AB - Introduction: The use of the N category of the TNM staging system, lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in predicting overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with rectal cancer is still controversial. Material and methods: A retrospective study of 445 patients with rectal cancer who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2017 in the University Complex Hospital of Vigo was performed. Patients were stratified according to number of lymph nodes examined (NLNE), N staging, LNR and LODDS. The analysis was performed using the log-rank test, Kaplan-Meier functions, Cox regression and ROC curves. Results: Five-year OS and DFS were 73.7% and 62.5%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed depending on NLNE. Increased LNR and LODDS were associated with shorter OS and DFS, independently of NLNE. Multivariate analysis showed that N stage, LNR and LODDS were independently associated with OS and DFS; however, the LODDS system obtained the best area under the curve, with greater predictive capacity for OS (AUC: 0.679) and DFS (AUC: 0.711). Conclusion: LODDS and LNR give prognostic information that is not related to NLNE. LODDS provides better prognostic accuracy in patients with negative nodes than LNR and N stage.
KW - LNR
KW - LODDS
KW - Lymph node involvement
KW - N
KW - Rectal cancer
KW - Stratification
KW - Survival
KW - LNR
KW - LODDS
KW - Lymph node involvement
KW - N
KW - Rectal cancer
KW - Stratification
KW - Survival
KW - LNR
KW - LODDS
KW - Lymph node involvement
KW - N
KW - Rectal cancer
KW - Stratification
KW - Survival
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85209580672
U2 - 10.1016/j.ciresp.2024.09.006
DO - 10.1016/j.ciresp.2024.09.006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85209580672
SN - 0009-739X
VL - 102
SP - 649
EP - 657
JO - Cirugia Espanola
JF - Cirugia Espanola
IS - 12
ER -