TY - JOUR
T1 - Preventing parastomal hernia using a modified sugarbaker technique with composite mesh during laparoscopic
T2 - Abdominoperineal resection a randomized controlled trial
AU - López-Cano, Manuel
AU - Serra-Aracil, Xavier
AU - Mora, Laura
AU - Sánchez-Garcia, José Luis
AU - Jiménez-Gómez, Luis Miguel
AU - Marti, Marc
AU - Vallribera, Francesc
AU - Fraccalvieri, Domenico
AU - Serracant, Anna
AU - Kreisler, Esther
AU - Biondo, Sebastiano
AU - Espin, Eloy
AU - Navarro-Soto, Salvador
AU - Armengol-Carrasco, Manuel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/11/28
Y1 - 2016/11/28
N2 - Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the reduction in the incidence of parastomal hernia (PH) after placement of prophylactic synthetic mesh using a modified Sugarbaker technique when a permanent end-colostomy is needed. Summary of Background Data: Prevention of PH formation is crucial given the high prevalence of PH and difficulties in the surgical repair of PH. Methods: A randomized, prospective, double-blind, and controlled trial. Rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection with permanent colostomy were randomized (1 : 1) to the mesh and nonmesh arms. In the mesh group, a large-pore lightweight composite mesh was placed in the intraperitoneal/onlay fashion using a modified Sugarbaker technique. PH was detected by computed tomography (CT) after a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Analysis was per-protocol. Results: The mesh group included 24 patients and the control group 28. Preoperative data, surgical time, and postoperative morbidity were similar. The median follow-up was 26 months. After CT examination, 6 of 24 PHs (25%) were observed in the mesh group compared with 18 of 28 (64.3%) in the nonmesh group (odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.18-0.82; P = 0.005). The Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant differences in favor of the mesh group (long-rank = 4.21, P = 0.04). The number needed to treat was 2.5, which confirmed the effectiveness of the intervention. Conclusions: Placement of a prosthetic mesh by the laparoscopic approach following the modified Sugarbaker technique is safe and effective in the prevention of PH, reducing significantly the incidence of PH.
AB - Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the reduction in the incidence of parastomal hernia (PH) after placement of prophylactic synthetic mesh using a modified Sugarbaker technique when a permanent end-colostomy is needed. Summary of Background Data: Prevention of PH formation is crucial given the high prevalence of PH and difficulties in the surgical repair of PH. Methods: A randomized, prospective, double-blind, and controlled trial. Rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection with permanent colostomy were randomized (1 : 1) to the mesh and nonmesh arms. In the mesh group, a large-pore lightweight composite mesh was placed in the intraperitoneal/onlay fashion using a modified Sugarbaker technique. PH was detected by computed tomography (CT) after a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Analysis was per-protocol. Results: The mesh group included 24 patients and the control group 28. Preoperative data, surgical time, and postoperative morbidity were similar. The median follow-up was 26 months. After CT examination, 6 of 24 PHs (25%) were observed in the mesh group compared with 18 of 28 (64.3%) in the nonmesh group (odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.18-0.82; P = 0.005). The Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant differences in favor of the mesh group (long-rank = 4.21, P = 0.04). The number needed to treat was 2.5, which confirmed the effectiveness of the intervention. Conclusions: Placement of a prosthetic mesh by the laparoscopic approach following the modified Sugarbaker technique is safe and effective in the prevention of PH, reducing significantly the incidence of PH.
KW - Abdominal wall
KW - Hernia
KW - Modified Sugarbaker technique
KW - Parastomal hernia
KW - Prevention
KW - Surgery
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84960347970
U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001684
DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001684
M3 - Article
C2 - 27828820
AN - SCOPUS:84960347970
SN - 0003-4932
VL - 264
SP - 923
EP - 928
JO - Annals of Surgery
JF - Annals of Surgery
IS - 6
ER -