TY - JOUR
T1 - Presence of problematic and disordered gambling in older age and validation of the South Oaks Gambling Scale
AU - Granero Perez, Rosario
AU - Jimenez‐Murcia, Susana
AU - Fernández‐Aranda, Fernando
AU - Del Pino-Gutiérrez, Amparo
AU - Mena-Moreno, Teresa
AU - Mestre-Bach, Gemma
AU - Gómez-Peña, Mónica
AU - Moragas, Laura
AU - Aymamí, Maria Neus
AU - Giroux, Isabelle
AU - Grall-Bronnec, Marie
AU - Sauvaget, Anne
AU - Codina, Ester
AU - Vintró-Alcaraz, Cristina
AU - Lozano-Madrid, María
AU - Camozzi, Marco
AU - Agüera, Zaida
AU - Sánchez-González, Jéssica
AU - Casalé, Gemma
AU - Sánchez, Isabel
AU - López-González, Hibai
AU - Valenciano-Mendoza, Eduardo
AU - Mora, Bernat
AU - Baenas, Isabel
AU - Menchón, José Manuel
PY - 2020/5/19
Y1 - 2020/5/19
N2 - The use of instruments originally developed for measuring gambling activity in younger populations may not be appropriate in older age individuals. The aim of this study was to examine the presence of problematic and disordered gambling in seniors aged 50 or over, and study the reliability and validity properties of the SOGS (a screening measure to identify gambling related problems). Two independent samples were recruited: a clinical group of n = 47 patients seeking treatment at a Pathological Gambling Outpatient Unit, and a population- based group of n = 361 participants recruited from the same geographical area. Confirmatory factor analysis verified the bifactor structure for the SOGS with two correlated underlying dimensions [measuring the impact of gambling on the self primarily (Cronbach's alpha α = 0.87) or on both the self and others also (α = 0.82)], and a global dimension of gambling severity (also with excellent internal consistency, α = 0.90). The SOG obtained excellent accuracy/validity for identifying gambling severity based on the DSM-5 criteria (area under the ROC curve AUC = 0.97 for discriminating disordered gambling and AUC = 0.91 for discriminating problem gambling), and good convergent validity with external measures of gambling (Pearson's correlation R = 0.91 with the total number of DSM-5 criteria for gambling disorder, and R = 0.55 with the debts accumulated due to gambling) and psychopathology (R = 0.50, 0.43 and 0.44 with the SCL-90R depression, anxiety and GSI scales). The optimal cutoff point for identifying gambling disorder was 4 (sensitivity Se = 92.3% and specificity Sp = 98.6%) and 2 for identifying problem gambling (Se = 78.8% and Sp = 96.7%). This study provides empirical support for the reliability and validity of the SOGS for assessing problem gambling in elders, and identifies two specific factors that could help both research and clinical decision-making, based on the severity and consequences of the gambling activity.
AB - The use of instruments originally developed for measuring gambling activity in younger populations may not be appropriate in older age individuals. The aim of this study was to examine the presence of problematic and disordered gambling in seniors aged 50 or over, and study the reliability and validity properties of the SOGS (a screening measure to identify gambling related problems). Two independent samples were recruited: a clinical group of n = 47 patients seeking treatment at a Pathological Gambling Outpatient Unit, and a population- based group of n = 361 participants recruited from the same geographical area. Confirmatory factor analysis verified the bifactor structure for the SOGS with two correlated underlying dimensions [measuring the impact of gambling on the self primarily (Cronbach's alpha α = 0.87) or on both the self and others also (α = 0.82)], and a global dimension of gambling severity (also with excellent internal consistency, α = 0.90). The SOG obtained excellent accuracy/validity for identifying gambling severity based on the DSM-5 criteria (area under the ROC curve AUC = 0.97 for discriminating disordered gambling and AUC = 0.91 for discriminating problem gambling), and good convergent validity with external measures of gambling (Pearson's correlation R = 0.91 with the total number of DSM-5 criteria for gambling disorder, and R = 0.55 with the debts accumulated due to gambling) and psychopathology (R = 0.50, 0.43 and 0.44 with the SCL-90R depression, anxiety and GSI scales). The optimal cutoff point for identifying gambling disorder was 4 (sensitivity Se = 92.3% and specificity Sp = 98.6%) and 2 for identifying problem gambling (Se = 78.8% and Sp = 96.7%). This study provides empirical support for the reliability and validity of the SOGS for assessing problem gambling in elders, and identifies two specific factors that could help both research and clinical decision-making, based on the severity and consequences of the gambling activity.
KW - Age Factors
KW - Aged
KW - Behavior, Addictive/diagnosis
KW - Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
KW - Female
KW - Gambling/psychology
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Mass Screening/methods
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Psychometrics/methods
KW - ROC Curve
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85084964250
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/0b48e97c-93e2-3420-9c6c-a9958d0ad469/
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0233222
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0233222
M3 - Article
C2 - 32428026
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 15
JO - PloS one
JF - PloS one
IS - 5
M1 - e0233222
ER -