Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Capecitabine After Standard Neo-/Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (GEICAM/2003-11_CIBOMA/2004-01)

Miguel Martín, Ana Lluch, Carlos H. Barrios, Laura Torrecillas, Manuel Ruiz-Borrego, Jose Bines, Jose Segalla, Ángel L Guerrero-Zotano, Jose A. García-Sáenz, Roberto Torres, Juan de la Haba, Elena García-Martínez, Henry L. Gómez, Antonio Llombart, Javier Salvador Bofill, José M. Baena-Cañada, Agustí Barnadas i Molins, L.. Calvo, Laura Pérez-Michel, Manuel RamosIsaura Fernández, Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, Jesús Cárdenas, Jeferson Vinholes, Eduardo Martínez de Dueñas, Maria J. Godes, Miguel A. Seguí, Antonio Antón, Pilar López-Álvarez, Jorge Moncayo, Gilberto Amorim, Esther Villar, Salvador Reyes, Carlos Sampaio, Bernardita Cardemil, Maria J. Escudero, Susana Bezares, Eva Carrasco

Producció científica: Contribució a revistaArticleRecercaAvaluat per experts

123 Cites (Scopus)

Resum

Operable triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) have a higher risk of relapse than non-TNBCs with standard therapy. The GEICAM/2003-11_CIBOMA/2004-01 trial explored extended adjuvant capecitabine after completion of standard chemotherapy in patients with early TNBC. Eligible patients were those with operable, node-positive-or node negative with tumor 1 cm or greater-TNBC, with prior anthracycline- and/or taxane-containing chemotherapy. After central confirmation of TNBC status by immunohistochemistry, patients were randomly assigned to either capecitabine or observation. Stratification factors included institution, prior taxane-based therapy, involved axillary lymph nodes, and centrally determined phenotype (basal v nonbasal, according to cytokeratins 5/6 and/or epidermal growth factor receptor positivity by immunohistochemistry). The primary objective was to compare disease-free survival (DFS) between both arms. Eight hundred seventy-six patients were randomly assigned to capecitabine (n = 448) or observation (n = 428). Median age was 49 years, 55.9% were lymph node negative, 73.9% had a basal phenotype, and 67.5% received previous anthracyclines plus taxanes. Median length of follow-up was 7.3 years. DFS was not significantly prolonged with capecitabine versus observation [hazard ratio (HR), 0.82; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.06; P =.136]. In a preplanned subgroup analysis, nonbasal patients seemed to derive benefit from the addition of capecitabine with a DFS HR of 0.53 versus 0.94 in those with basal phenotype (interaction test P =.0694) and an HR for overall survival of 0.42 versus 1.23 in basal phenotype (interaction test P =.0052). Tolerance of capecitabine was as expected, with 75.2% of patients completing the planned 8 cycles. This study failed to show a statistically significant increase in DFS by adding extended capecitabine to standard chemotherapy in patients with early TNBC. In a preplanned subset analysis, patients with nonbasal phenotype seemed to obtain benefit with capecitabine, although this will require additional validation.
Idioma originalAnglès
Pàgines (de-a)0203-213
Nombre de pàgines11
RevistaJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volum38
DOIs
Estat de la publicacióPublicada - 2019

Fingerprint

Navegar pels temes de recerca de 'Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Capecitabine After Standard Neo-/Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (GEICAM/2003-11_CIBOMA/2004-01)'. Junts formen un fingerprint únic.

Com citar-ho