TY - JOUR
T1 - Participatory multi-criteria decision aid: Operationalizing an integrated assessment of ecosystem services
T2 - Operationalizing an integrated assessment of ecosystem services
AU - Langemeyer, Johannes
AU - Palomo, Ignacio
AU - Baraibar, Sergio
AU - Gómez-Baggethun, Erik
N1 - Funding Information:
We especially thank all the participants of the workshops, Ana Villa, and Jesús Mateos and the Fundación Doñana 21 and all others who facilitated our field work. We would also like to thank the unknown reviewers for their detailed and encouraging remarks and D. Wedgewood for his edits. This research was funded by European Commission project OpenNESS (FP7-Grant agreement: 308428308428 ), by a Juan de la Cierva Formación grant from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness to I.P. and by a grant of the talent development program of the Norwegian University of Life Sciences ( NMBU ) to E.G.B..
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier B.V.
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/4/1
Y1 - 2018/4/1
N2 - Ongoing ecosystem alterations underscore the need for ecosystem service assessment to urgently enter policy-making. Participatory methods and a systematic inclusion of stakeholders are crucial yet underdeveloped cornerstones of environmental decision making. This study aims at conducting a transparent and legitimized integrated assessment of ecosystem services that rigorously involves stakeholder knowledge and values in environmental decision making. To this end, participatory multi-criteria decision aid was applied to the case of declining vineyard ecosystems surrounding the National Park of Doñana in south-west Spain. Data was gained by means of a survey (n = 178), interviews (n = 21), and three stakeholder workshops (each with 15–21 participants). We found that stakeholder engagement improved all steps of decision making, including problem structuring, policy evaluation, and operationalization. Our results thereby reinforce two major arguments for adopting participatory methods in integrated ecosystem service assessments: (1) the inclusion of stakeholders and their objectives adds legitimacy to decision making; (2) the integration of stakeholder knowledge provides important information for decision making.
AB - Ongoing ecosystem alterations underscore the need for ecosystem service assessment to urgently enter policy-making. Participatory methods and a systematic inclusion of stakeholders are crucial yet underdeveloped cornerstones of environmental decision making. This study aims at conducting a transparent and legitimized integrated assessment of ecosystem services that rigorously involves stakeholder knowledge and values in environmental decision making. To this end, participatory multi-criteria decision aid was applied to the case of declining vineyard ecosystems surrounding the National Park of Doñana in south-west Spain. Data was gained by means of a survey (n = 178), interviews (n = 21), and three stakeholder workshops (each with 15–21 participants). We found that stakeholder engagement improved all steps of decision making, including problem structuring, policy evaluation, and operationalization. Our results thereby reinforce two major arguments for adopting participatory methods in integrated ecosystem service assessments: (1) the inclusion of stakeholders and their objectives adds legitimacy to decision making; (2) the integration of stakeholder knowledge provides important information for decision making.
KW - Doñana
KW - Ecosystem services stewardship
KW - Integrated valuation
KW - Local ecological knowledge
KW - Multi-criteria evaluation
KW - Participatory decision making
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041377080&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.012
DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.012
M3 - Article
SN - 2212-0416
VL - 30
SP - 49
EP - 60
JO - Ecosystem Services
JF - Ecosystem Services
ER -