Mesh in the hiatus: A controversial issue

Eduardo M. Targarona, Gali Bendahan, Carmen Balague, Jordi Garriga, Manuel Trias

Producció científica: Contribució a una revistaArticle de revisióRecercaAvaluat per experts

104 Cites (Scopus)

Resum

Objective: To analyze the experience acquired to date on the use of prosthetic mesh to prevent recurrence after laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Data Sources: Current English-language literature review. Study Selection: Case reports, series, and opinion articles on the use of mesh for paraesophageal hernia repair. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Study type and results were analyzed. Most articles were short case series. Few comparative or randomized trials assessing the procedure have been published to date. The information available showed that the use of a mesh for hiatal repair was safe and prevented recurrence. However, data on the long-term results were lacking, and infrequent but severe complications may arise. Conclusions: The mesh should be used selectively, and the decision to proceed should be based on clinical experience. In light of the evidence available, however, it appears to be safe, and the fears expressed in the past have not been confirmed.
Idioma originalEnglish
Pàgines (de-a)1286-1296
RevistaArchives of Surgery
Volum139
Número12
DOIs
Estat de la publicacióPublicada - 1 de des. 2004

Fingerprint

Navegar pels temes de recerca de 'Mesh in the hiatus: A controversial issue'. Junts formen un fingerprint únic.

Com citar-ho