TY - JOUR
T1 - LTCC meso-analytical system for chloride ion determination in drinking waters
AU - Ibañez-Garcia, N.
AU - Gonçalves, R. D.Machado
AU - da Rocha, Z. Mendes
AU - Góngora-Rubio, M. R.
AU - Seabra, A. C.
AU - Chamarro, J. Alonso
PY - 2006/10/25
Y1 - 2006/10/25
N2 - The low temperature co-fired ceramics (LTCC) technology is introduced as an excellent alternative to silicon, glass or plastic materials for the fabrication of miniaturized analytical devices. This fabrication technology enables the generation of complex three-dimensional geometries, as well as the integration of sample pretreatment steps and even the detection system. The evaluation of an LTCC-made device which integrates a three-dimensional serpentine mixer and an ion selective electrode for the detection of Cl- ion was performed. Analytical features derived from calibration experiments were: slope = 59(±2) mV/dec, LLLR = 0.56 mM (20 ppm), r2 > 0.99; LOD = 0.16(±0.03) mM (6(±3) ppm), the R.S.D. (for n = 7 and 95% confidence) at 1.41 mM (50 ppm) Cl-, was 1.44%. Drinking water samples were analyzed by the LTCC system and results were compared with those obtained by capillary electrophoresis, showing no significant differences between both methods. © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
AB - The low temperature co-fired ceramics (LTCC) technology is introduced as an excellent alternative to silicon, glass or plastic materials for the fabrication of miniaturized analytical devices. This fabrication technology enables the generation of complex three-dimensional geometries, as well as the integration of sample pretreatment steps and even the detection system. The evaluation of an LTCC-made device which integrates a three-dimensional serpentine mixer and an ion selective electrode for the detection of Cl- ion was performed. Analytical features derived from calibration experiments were: slope = 59(±2) mV/dec, LLLR = 0.56 mM (20 ppm), r2 > 0.99; LOD = 0.16(±0.03) mM (6(±3) ppm), the R.S.D. (for n = 7 and 95% confidence) at 1.41 mM (50 ppm) Cl-, was 1.44%. Drinking water samples were analyzed by the LTCC system and results were compared with those obtained by capillary electrophoresis, showing no significant differences between both methods. © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
KW - Chloride ion
KW - Integration
KW - LTCC
KW - Miniaturization
KW - Potentiometry
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/33747868689
U2 - 10.1016/j.snb.2006.04.063
DO - 10.1016/j.snb.2006.04.063
M3 - Article
SN - 0925-4005
VL - 118
SP - 67
EP - 72
JO - Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical
JF - Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical
IS - 1-2
ER -