TY - JOUR
T1 - Lithium-induced malaise does not interfere with adaptation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis to stress
AU - Sanchís-Ollé, Maria
AU - Ortega-Sánchez, Juan A.
AU - Belda, Xavier
AU - Gagliano, Humberto
AU - Nadal, Roser
AU - Armario, Antonio
PY - 2017/4/3
Y1 - 2017/4/3
N2 - © 2017 Elsevier Inc. We have recently demonstrated that adaptation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis to repeated exposure to a stressor does not follow the rules of habituation and can be fully expressed after a single experience with severe stressors. In the present work we tested the hypothesis that adaptation could be impaired if animals experience malaise during initial exposure to the stressor. To this end, animals were allowed to drink saccharin for 30 min before being exposed for 3 h to immobilization on boards (IMO), a severe stressor; then they were given either saline or lithium ip after the first hour of IMO. Stress-naïve rats followed exactly the same procedure except IMO. Exposure to IMO caused a strong activation of the HPA axis whereas the effect of lithium was modest. Both IMO and lithium administration resulted in conditioned taste aversion to saccharin when evaluated 4 days later. When all animals were exposed to IMO 6 days later, reduced HPA response and less impact on body weight was observed in the two groups previously exposed to IMO as compared with stress-naïve rats. Therefore, lithium administration during the first IMO exposure did not affect adaptation of the HPA axis and weight gain. These results indicate that malaise per se only weakly activated the HPA axis and argue against the hypothesis that signs of physical malaise during exposure to the stressor could impair HPA adaptation.
AB - © 2017 Elsevier Inc. We have recently demonstrated that adaptation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis to repeated exposure to a stressor does not follow the rules of habituation and can be fully expressed after a single experience with severe stressors. In the present work we tested the hypothesis that adaptation could be impaired if animals experience malaise during initial exposure to the stressor. To this end, animals were allowed to drink saccharin for 30 min before being exposed for 3 h to immobilization on boards (IMO), a severe stressor; then they were given either saline or lithium ip after the first hour of IMO. Stress-naïve rats followed exactly the same procedure except IMO. Exposure to IMO caused a strong activation of the HPA axis whereas the effect of lithium was modest. Both IMO and lithium administration resulted in conditioned taste aversion to saccharin when evaluated 4 days later. When all animals were exposed to IMO 6 days later, reduced HPA response and less impact on body weight was observed in the two groups previously exposed to IMO as compared with stress-naïve rats. Therefore, lithium administration during the first IMO exposure did not affect adaptation of the HPA axis and weight gain. These results indicate that malaise per se only weakly activated the HPA axis and argue against the hypothesis that signs of physical malaise during exposure to the stressor could impair HPA adaptation.
KW - Adaptation
KW - Conditioned taste aversion
KW - Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis
KW - Immobilization stress
KW - Lithium chloride
KW - Stress-induced malaise
U2 - 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.01.006
DO - 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.01.006
M3 - Article
SN - 0278-5846
VL - 75
SP - 77
EP - 83
JO - Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
JF - Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
ER -