TY - JOUR
T1 - Individualization, inequality, and labor
T2 - a qualitative approach
AU - Lobato, Marta M.
AU - Molina, José Luis
AU - Valenzuela-García, Hugo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Nature B.V.
PY - 2018/9/1
Y1 - 2018/9/1
N2 - In this paper, we show how we came to explore Beck’s theory of individualization in the light of a qualitative study of livelihood strategies in post-2008 Spain and Cyprus. We observed that experiences of downward social mobility in contexts of welfare retreat and precarious labor conditions were compelling people to build marketed individualities and to create individual biographies with recourse to a highly individualized rhetoric. However, analysis of a very diverse sample of subjects from different socio-economic backgrounds showed us that individualization theory must be conceptualized within a framework of social structures, and that Beck’s individualization theory fails to recognize its persistence in contemporary societies. We therefore propose looking at individualization as a contemporary process through which class differences are expressed. Only in this way can it serve as a useful theoretical tool with which to understand the workings of contemporary capitalism and the ways in which new values and moral frameworks are being formed.
AB - In this paper, we show how we came to explore Beck’s theory of individualization in the light of a qualitative study of livelihood strategies in post-2008 Spain and Cyprus. We observed that experiences of downward social mobility in contexts of welfare retreat and precarious labor conditions were compelling people to build marketed individualities and to create individual biographies with recourse to a highly individualized rhetoric. However, analysis of a very diverse sample of subjects from different socio-economic backgrounds showed us that individualization theory must be conceptualized within a framework of social structures, and that Beck’s individualization theory fails to recognize its persistence in contemporary societies. We therefore propose looking at individualization as a contemporary process through which class differences are expressed. Only in this way can it serve as a useful theoretical tool with which to understand the workings of contemporary capitalism and the ways in which new values and moral frameworks are being formed.
KW - Crisis
KW - Individualization
KW - Labor
KW - Livelihood strategies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048834767&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10624-018-9512-y
DO - 10.1007/s10624-018-9512-y
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85048834767
SN - 0304-4092
VL - 42
SP - 277
EP - 291
JO - Dialectical Anthropology
JF - Dialectical Anthropology
IS - 3
ER -