TY - JOUR
T1 - Incentives and manipulability in Choice Modeling. Some experimental results
AU - Manrique, Olga Lucia
AU - Riera, Pere
PY - 2015/1/1
Y1 - 2015/1/1
N2 - From a mechanism design perspective, a valuation exercise can be analyzed in terms of its incentive compatibility. However, a non-incentive compatible exercise does not automatically imply that participants will engage in strategic behavior. The likelihood of this behavior can be tested through lab experiments. In this regard, choice modeling has received little attention compared to the contingent valuation method. This article reports a laboratory experiment using contingent grouping, a choice modeling valuation variant. The main conclusion is that the manipulability of this type of valuation exercises may be too difficult to realize by the participants to behave strategically - unless they are made aware in advance.
AB - From a mechanism design perspective, a valuation exercise can be analyzed in terms of its incentive compatibility. However, a non-incentive compatible exercise does not automatically imply that participants will engage in strategic behavior. The likelihood of this behavior can be tested through lab experiments. In this regard, choice modeling has received little attention compared to the contingent valuation method. This article reports a laboratory experiment using contingent grouping, a choice modeling valuation variant. The main conclusion is that the manipulability of this type of valuation exercises may be too difficult to realize by the participants to behave strategically - unless they are made aware in advance.
KW - Incentive compatibility
KW - Contingent grouping
KW - Choice experiment
KW - Contingent valuation
UR - https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5132084
UR - http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5132084
U2 - 10.3917/redp.252.0197
DO - 10.3917/redp.252.0197
M3 - Article
SN - 0373-2630
VL - 125
SP - 197
EP - 207
JO - Revue d'Economie Politique
JF - Revue d'Economie Politique
IS - 2
ER -