TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of operatoŕs experience on peri-procedural outcomes with Watchman FLX :
T2 - Insights from the FLX-SPA registry
AU - Cruz-González, Ignacio
AU - Torres Saura, Francisco
AU - Trejo-Velasco, Blanca
AU - Fernández Díaz, José Antonio
AU - Fajardo Molina, Ricardo
AU - del Valle-Fernández, Raquel
AU - Moreno Terribas, Gerardo
AU - Martí Sánchez, David
AU - López-Mínguez, José-Ramón
AU - Gomez-Blazquez, Ivan
AU - Sanmartin Pena, Juan-Carlos
AU - Botas, Javier
AU - Martin Lorenzo, Pedro
AU - Palazuelos, Jorge
AU - Albarrán Rincon, Ramón
AU - Mohandes, Mohsen
AU - Rodriguez Entem, Felipe-Jose
AU - Martí, Gerard
AU - Valero, Ernesto
AU - Gutiérrez, Hipólito
AU - Amat-Santos, Ignacio J.
AU - Nombela-Franco, Luis
AU - Salinas, Pablo
AU - Teruel, Luis
AU - Gómez-Hospital, Joan-Antoni
AU - Arzamendi, Dabit
AU - Torres Sanabria, Mario
AU - Calle Pérez, Germán
AU - Cañadas Pruaño, Dolores
AU - Pérez de Prado, Armando
AU - Benito González, Tomás
AU - Arroyo-Úcar, Eduardo
AU - Estévez-Loureiro, Rodrigo
AU - Caneiro-Queija, Berenice
AU - Ibañez Criado, José L.
AU - Ruiz-Nodar, Juan M.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background: The Watchman FLX is a device upgrade of the Watchman 2.5 that incorporates several design enhancements intended to simplify left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) and improve procedural outcomes. This study compares peri-procedural results of LAAO with Watchman FLX (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts) in centers with varying degrees of experience with the Watchman 2.5 and Watchman FLX. Methods: Prospective, multicenter, "real-world" registry including consecutive patients undergoing LAAO with the Watchman FLX at 26 Spanish sites (FLX-SPA registry). Implanting centers were classified according to the center's prior experience with the Watchman 2.5. A further division of centers according to whether or not they had performed ≤ 10 or > 10Watchman FLX implants was prespecified at the beginning of the study. Procedural outcomes of institutions stratified according to their experience with the Watchman 2.5 and FLX devices were compared. Results: 359 patients [mean age 75.5 (SD8.1), CHADS-VASc 4.4 (SD1.4), HAS-BLED 3.8(SD0.9)] were included. Global success rate was 98.6%, successful LAAO with the first selected device size was achieved in 95.5% patients and the device was implanted at first attempt in 78.6% cases. There were only 9(2.5%) major peri-procedural complications. No differences in efficacy or safety results according to the centeŕs previous experience with Watchman 2.5 and procedural volume with Watchman FLX existed. Conclusions: The Watchman FLX attains high procedural success rates with complete LAA sealing in unselected, real-world patients, along with a low incidence of peri-procedural complications, regardless of operatoŕs experience with its previous device iteration or the number of Watchman FLX devices implanted.
AB - Background: The Watchman FLX is a device upgrade of the Watchman 2.5 that incorporates several design enhancements intended to simplify left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) and improve procedural outcomes. This study compares peri-procedural results of LAAO with Watchman FLX (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts) in centers with varying degrees of experience with the Watchman 2.5 and Watchman FLX. Methods: Prospective, multicenter, "real-world" registry including consecutive patients undergoing LAAO with the Watchman FLX at 26 Spanish sites (FLX-SPA registry). Implanting centers were classified according to the center's prior experience with the Watchman 2.5. A further division of centers according to whether or not they had performed ≤ 10 or > 10Watchman FLX implants was prespecified at the beginning of the study. Procedural outcomes of institutions stratified according to their experience with the Watchman 2.5 and FLX devices were compared. Results: 359 patients [mean age 75.5 (SD8.1), CHADS-VASc 4.4 (SD1.4), HAS-BLED 3.8(SD0.9)] were included. Global success rate was 98.6%, successful LAAO with the first selected device size was achieved in 95.5% patients and the device was implanted at first attempt in 78.6% cases. There were only 9(2.5%) major peri-procedural complications. No differences in efficacy or safety results according to the centeŕs previous experience with Watchman 2.5 and procedural volume with Watchman FLX existed. Conclusions: The Watchman FLX attains high procedural success rates with complete LAA sealing in unselected, real-world patients, along with a low incidence of peri-procedural complications, regardless of operatoŕs experience with its previous device iteration or the number of Watchman FLX devices implanted.
KW - Atrial fibrillation
KW - Left atrial appendage occlusion
KW - Devices
KW - Outcomes
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85121913203
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100941
DO - 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100941
M3 - Article
C2 - 35024431
SN - 2352-9067
VL - 38
JO - IJC Heart and Vasculature
JF - IJC Heart and Vasculature
ER -