Impact of operatoŕs experience on peri-procedural outcomes with Watchman FLX : Insights from the FLX-SPA registry

Ignacio Cruz-González, Francisco Torres Saura, Blanca Trejo-Velasco, José Antonio Fernández Díaz, Ricardo Fajardo Molina, Raquel del Valle-Fernández, Gerardo Moreno Terribas, David Martí Sánchez, José-Ramón López-Mínguez, Ivan Gomez-Blazquez, Juan-Carlos Sanmartin Pena, Javier Botas, Pedro Martin Lorenzo, Jorge Palazuelos, Ramón Albarrán Rincon, Mohsen Mohandes, Felipe-Jose Rodriguez Entem, Gerard Martí, Ernesto Valero, Hipólito GutiérrezIgnacio J. Amat-Santos, Luis Nombela-Franco, Pablo Salinas, Luis Teruel, Joan-Antoni Gómez-Hospital, Dabit Arzamendi, Mario Torres Sanabria, Germán Calle Pérez, Dolores Cañadas Pruaño, Armando Pérez de Prado, Tomás Benito González, Eduardo Arroyo-Úcar, Rodrigo Estévez-Loureiro, Berenice Caneiro-Queija, José L. Ibañez Criado, Juan M. Ruiz-Nodar

Producció científica: Contribució a revistaArticleRecercaAvaluat per experts

2 Cites (Scopus)

Resum

Background: The Watchman FLX is a device upgrade of the Watchman 2.5 that incorporates several design enhancements intended to simplify left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) and improve procedural outcomes. This study compares peri-procedural results of LAAO with Watchman FLX (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts) in centers with varying degrees of experience with the Watchman 2.5 and Watchman FLX. Methods: Prospective, multicenter, "real-world" registry including consecutive patients undergoing LAAO with the Watchman FLX at 26 Spanish sites (FLX-SPA registry). Implanting centers were classified according to the center's prior experience with the Watchman 2.5. A further division of centers according to whether or not they had performed ≤ 10 or > 10Watchman FLX implants was prespecified at the beginning of the study. Procedural outcomes of institutions stratified according to their experience with the Watchman 2.5 and FLX devices were compared. Results: 359 patients [mean age 75.5 (SD8.1), CHADS-VASc 4.4 (SD1.4), HAS-BLED 3.8(SD0.9)] were included. Global success rate was 98.6%, successful LAAO with the first selected device size was achieved in 95.5% patients and the device was implanted at first attempt in 78.6% cases. There were only 9(2.5%) major peri-procedural complications. No differences in efficacy or safety results according to the centeŕs previous experience with Watchman 2.5 and procedural volume with Watchman FLX existed. Conclusions: The Watchman FLX attains high procedural success rates with complete LAA sealing in unselected, real-world patients, along with a low incidence of peri-procedural complications, regardless of operatoŕs experience with its previous device iteration or the number of Watchman FLX devices implanted.
Idioma originalAnglès
RevistaIJC Heart and Vasculature
Volum38
DOIs
Estat de la publicacióPublicada - 2022

Fingerprint

Navegar pels temes de recerca de 'Impact of operatoŕs experience on peri-procedural outcomes with Watchman FLX : Insights from the FLX-SPA registry'. Junts formen un fingerprint únic.

Com citar-ho