TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of bcr-abl1 transcript type on response, treatment-free remission rate and survival in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib
AU - Marcé, Silvia
AU - Xicoy, Blanca
AU - García, Olga
AU - Cabezón, Marta
AU - Estrada Barreras, Natalia
AU - Vélez, Patrícia
AU - Boque, Concepcion
AU - Sagüés, Miguel
AU - Angona, Anna
AU - Teruel-Montoya, Raúl
AU - Ferrer-Marín, Francisca
AU - Amat, Paula
AU - Hernández-Boluda, Juan Carlos
AU - Ibarra, Mariana M.
AU - Anguita, Eduardo
AU - Cortés, Montserrat
AU - Fernández-Ruiz, Andrés
AU - Fontanals, Sandra
AU - Zamora, Lurdes
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The most frequent BCR-ABL1-p210 transcripts in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are e14a2 and e13a2. Imatinib (IM) is the most common first-line tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) used to treat CML. Some studies suggest that BCR-ABL1 transcript types confer different responses to IM. The objective of this study was to correlate the expression of e14a2 or e13a2 to clinical characteristics, cumulative cytogenetic and molecular responses to IM, acquisition of deep molecular response (DMR) and its duration (sDMR), progression rate (CIP), overall survival (OS), and treatment-free remission (TFR) rate. We studied 202 CML patients, 76 expressing the e13a2 and 126 the e14a2, and correlated the differential transcript expression with the above-mentioned parameters. There were no differences in the cumulative incidence of cytogenetic responses nor in the acquisition of DMR and sDMR between the two groups, but the e14a2 transcript had a positive impact on molecular response during the first 6 months, whereas the e13a2 was associated with improved long-term OS. No correlation was observed between the transcript type and TFR rate
AB - The most frequent BCR-ABL1-p210 transcripts in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are e14a2 and e13a2. Imatinib (IM) is the most common first-line tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) used to treat CML. Some studies suggest that BCR-ABL1 transcript types confer different responses to IM. The objective of this study was to correlate the expression of e14a2 or e13a2 to clinical characteristics, cumulative cytogenetic and molecular responses to IM, acquisition of deep molecular response (DMR) and its duration (sDMR), progression rate (CIP), overall survival (OS), and treatment-free remission (TFR) rate. We studied 202 CML patients, 76 expressing the e13a2 and 126 the e14a2, and correlated the differential transcript expression with the above-mentioned parameters. There were no differences in the cumulative incidence of cytogenetic responses nor in the acquisition of DMR and sDMR between the two groups, but the e14a2 transcript had a positive impact on molecular response during the first 6 months, whereas the e13a2 was associated with improved long-term OS. No correlation was observed between the transcript type and TFR rate
U2 - 10.3390/jcm10143146
DO - 10.3390/jcm10143146
M3 - Article
C2 - 34300312
SN - 2077-0383
VL - 10
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
JF - Journal of Clinical Medicine
IS - 14
ER -