TY - JOUR
T1 - Frequent attendance in primary care
T2 - Comparison and implications of different definitions
AU - Luciano, Juan V.
AU - Fernández, Ana
AU - Pinto-Meza, Alejandra
AU - Luján, Leila
AU - Bellón, Juan A.
AU - Garcia-Campayo, Javier
AU - Peñarrubia, María T.
AU - Fernández, Rita
AU - Sanavia, Marta
AU - Blanco, Maria E.
AU - Haro, Josep M.
AU - Palao, Diego J.
AU - Serrano-Blanco, Antoni
PY - 2010/2
Y1 - 2010/2
N2 - Background: The diversity of definitions of frequent attendance in the literature hampers comparison of their precision, validity, and associated factors. Aim: To examine different definitions of frequent attendance in order to identify the sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with frequent attendance in primary care, according to each definition. Design of study: One-phase cross-sectional study. Setting: Seventy-seven primary care centres in Catalonia, Spain. Method: A total of 3815 primary care patients were interviewed between October 2005 and March 2006. Three definitions of frequent attendance were tested: (1) frequent attenders as the top 25% and the top 10% consulting patients; (2) frequent attenders as the top 25% and the top 10% consulting patients stratified by age and sex; and (3) frequent attenders as the top 25% and the top 10% consulting patients stratified by the presence of physical/mental conditions (patients with only mental disorders, with only chronic physical conditions, with comorbid conditions, and with no condition). Multilevel logistic regressions were used. Results: The following factors were systematically related to frequent attender status: being on sick leave, being born outside of Spain, reporting mental health problems as the main reason for consulting, and having arthritis/rheumatism, or bronchitis. Major depression was related to frequent attendance in two of the three definitions. The factor 'GP' was related to frequent attendance when the top decile cut-off point was used. The models with a 10% cut-off point were more discriminative than those with a 25% cut-off point: the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for models with a 25% cut-off and a 10% cut-off ranged between 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70 to 0.73) and 0.75 (95% CI = 0.74 to 0.77) and between 0.79 (95% CI = 0.78 to 0.81) and 0.85 (95% CI = 0.83 to 0.86), respectively. Conclusion: The way frequent attendance is defined is of crucial importance. It is recommended that a more discriminative definition of frequent attendance is used (the top 10%).
AB - Background: The diversity of definitions of frequent attendance in the literature hampers comparison of their precision, validity, and associated factors. Aim: To examine different definitions of frequent attendance in order to identify the sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with frequent attendance in primary care, according to each definition. Design of study: One-phase cross-sectional study. Setting: Seventy-seven primary care centres in Catalonia, Spain. Method: A total of 3815 primary care patients were interviewed between October 2005 and March 2006. Three definitions of frequent attendance were tested: (1) frequent attenders as the top 25% and the top 10% consulting patients; (2) frequent attenders as the top 25% and the top 10% consulting patients stratified by age and sex; and (3) frequent attenders as the top 25% and the top 10% consulting patients stratified by the presence of physical/mental conditions (patients with only mental disorders, with only chronic physical conditions, with comorbid conditions, and with no condition). Multilevel logistic regressions were used. Results: The following factors were systematically related to frequent attender status: being on sick leave, being born outside of Spain, reporting mental health problems as the main reason for consulting, and having arthritis/rheumatism, or bronchitis. Major depression was related to frequent attendance in two of the three definitions. The factor 'GP' was related to frequent attendance when the top decile cut-off point was used. The models with a 10% cut-off point were more discriminative than those with a 25% cut-off point: the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for models with a 25% cut-off and a 10% cut-off ranged between 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70 to 0.73) and 0.75 (95% CI = 0.74 to 0.77) and between 0.79 (95% CI = 0.78 to 0.81) and 0.85 (95% CI = 0.83 to 0.86), respectively. Conclusion: The way frequent attendance is defined is of crucial importance. It is recommended that a more discriminative definition of frequent attendance is used (the top 10%).
KW - Chronic illness
KW - Frequent attendance
KW - Health services
KW - Mental disorders
KW - Primary health care
KW - Utilisation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76249133105&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3399/bjgp10X483139
DO - 10.3399/bjgp10X483139
M3 - Article
C2 - 20132693
AN - SCOPUS:76249133105
SN - 0960-1643
VL - 60
SP - 95
EP - 100
JO - British Journal of General Practice
JF - British Journal of General Practice
IS - 571
ER -