TY - JOUR
T1 - First clinical evaluation of the new single-use flexible and semirigid pusen ureteroscopes
AU - Emiliani, Esteban
AU - Mercadé, Asier
AU - Millan, Félix
AU - Sánchez-Martín, Francisco
AU - Konstantinidis, Cristian Andrés
AU - Angerri, Oriol
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - © 2018, Polish Urological Association. All rights reserved. Introduction The purpose of the present study was to clinically evaluate two new single-use Pusen ureteroscopes, one semirigid with a flexible tip (srURS) and one flexible (fURS). Materials and methods During ten consecutive procedures (five srURS and five fURS), we subjectively evaluated on a scale from 0 (poor) to 10 (excellent), the scope's deflection, image quality, and maneuverability prior to, during and after the surgery. Patient demographics, complications with the devices, and troubleshooting were recorded. Results There were a total of ten patients, five of which were female while the other five were male. Mean age was 58.9 years. Seven patients had a single kidney stone with mean size of 9.6 mm (1.6–20 mm). Half of the patients were pre-stented. For the fURS, the preoperative image quality rating was 8.4 (8–10), compared with 6.8 (4–9) during surgery. The preoperative deflection rating was 9.6+ 0.9 (8–10), while during surgery this decreased to 8.0 (6–10) and to 6.0 (4–8) when using a laser fiber. The srURS had a preoperative image quality rating of 9.2 (8–10), which decreased to 7.6 (6–9) while using the scope. The deflection rating decreased from 9.4 (7–10) preoperatively to 7.0 (1–10) postoperatively, and a similar reduction was observed in the maneuverability rating, from 9.6 (8–10) to 7.4 (1–10). Ureteroscopy was considered as a standard in four of the fURS and three of the srURS procedures. The mean overall satisfaction rating was 6. Conclusions The two new single-use ureteroscopes, one flexible and one semirigid, were considered to have allowed standard ureteroscopy in four and three out of the five procedures for each scope, respectively. The image quality, deflection, and maneuverability ratings decreased during the procedure for both scopes.
AB - © 2018, Polish Urological Association. All rights reserved. Introduction The purpose of the present study was to clinically evaluate two new single-use Pusen ureteroscopes, one semirigid with a flexible tip (srURS) and one flexible (fURS). Materials and methods During ten consecutive procedures (five srURS and five fURS), we subjectively evaluated on a scale from 0 (poor) to 10 (excellent), the scope's deflection, image quality, and maneuverability prior to, during and after the surgery. Patient demographics, complications with the devices, and troubleshooting were recorded. Results There were a total of ten patients, five of which were female while the other five were male. Mean age was 58.9 years. Seven patients had a single kidney stone with mean size of 9.6 mm (1.6–20 mm). Half of the patients were pre-stented. For the fURS, the preoperative image quality rating was 8.4 (8–10), compared with 6.8 (4–9) during surgery. The preoperative deflection rating was 9.6+ 0.9 (8–10), while during surgery this decreased to 8.0 (6–10) and to 6.0 (4–8) when using a laser fiber. The srURS had a preoperative image quality rating of 9.2 (8–10), which decreased to 7.6 (6–9) while using the scope. The deflection rating decreased from 9.4 (7–10) preoperatively to 7.0 (1–10) postoperatively, and a similar reduction was observed in the maneuverability rating, from 9.6 (8–10) to 7.4 (1–10). Ureteroscopy was considered as a standard in four of the fURS and three of the srURS procedures. The mean overall satisfaction rating was 6. Conclusions The two new single-use ureteroscopes, one flexible and one semirigid, were considered to have allowed standard ureteroscopy in four and three out of the five procedures for each scope, respectively. The image quality, deflection, and maneuverability ratings decreased during the procedure for both scopes.
KW - Flexible ureteroscope
KW - Pusen
KW - Semirigid ureteroscope
KW - Single-use ureteroscope
KW - Ureteroscopy
KW - Urolithiasis
U2 - 10.5173/ceju.2018.1620
DO - 10.5173/ceju.2018.1620
M3 - Article
C2 - 30038812
SN - 2080-4806
VL - 71
SP - 208
EP - 213
JO - Central European Journal of Urology
JF - Central European Journal of Urology
IS - 2
ER -