TY - JOUR
T1 - Expert patients leading activities on social justice
T2 - towards patient-centered education
AU - Feijoo-Cid, Maria
AU - Arreciado Marañón, Antonia
AU - Fernández-Cano, María Isabel
AU - García-Sierra, Rosa María
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by a Grant “Narrativas de enfermedad de paciente experto (Expert Patient Illness Narratives; EPIN) como alternativa docente para construir un modelo de cuidados más deliberado y justo (FSXXXVI-06)” from Fundació Autònoma Solidaria, Spain, in 2019 Educational activities for development addressed to the university community.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2023/12/21
Y1 - 2023/12/21
N2 - Background: Social justice is recognized by reputable international organizations as a professional nursing value. However, there are serious doubts as to whether it is embodied in Catalan nursing education. Objectives: To explore what nursing students take away from two teaching activities led by expert patients (one presentation and three expert patient illness narratives) on the topics of social justice, patient rights, and person-centered care. Research design: Qualitative study using a content analysis approach. The research plan included (1) think-pair-share activities (additional faculty-assisted presentation and three faculty-assisted, semi-structured scripted narratives); (2) paired reflections; (3) focus groups; and (4) content analysis of paired reflections and focus groups. Participants and research context: Fourth-year nursing degree students at the Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Spain. Convenience sampling was used. Ethical considerations: The UAB Research Ethics Committee did not deem it necessary to apply any specific measures. We fully explained to patients that they could decide what medical information they would share with the students that was relevant to their learning, and we provided students with guidelines about patient confidentiality, dignity, and respect. Findings/results: The students engaged in reflection about their education (recognizing that it had been centered on the professional and not the patient) and their relationship with the patient, in which they reproduced low-involvement patient care by modeling behaviors of their nurse educator. Moreover, they valued a person-centered care model with an emphasis on the emotional part but left out decision-making as an individual right of people. Conclusions: The think-pair-share activities were useful to spark self-reflection among students, who identified aspects to change in their own practice, and reflected about their own education process, both of which promote change.
AB - Background: Social justice is recognized by reputable international organizations as a professional nursing value. However, there are serious doubts as to whether it is embodied in Catalan nursing education. Objectives: To explore what nursing students take away from two teaching activities led by expert patients (one presentation and three expert patient illness narratives) on the topics of social justice, patient rights, and person-centered care. Research design: Qualitative study using a content analysis approach. The research plan included (1) think-pair-share activities (additional faculty-assisted presentation and three faculty-assisted, semi-structured scripted narratives); (2) paired reflections; (3) focus groups; and (4) content analysis of paired reflections and focus groups. Participants and research context: Fourth-year nursing degree students at the Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Spain. Convenience sampling was used. Ethical considerations: The UAB Research Ethics Committee did not deem it necessary to apply any specific measures. We fully explained to patients that they could decide what medical information they would share with the students that was relevant to their learning, and we provided students with guidelines about patient confidentiality, dignity, and respect. Findings/results: The students engaged in reflection about their education (recognizing that it had been centered on the professional and not the patient) and their relationship with the patient, in which they reproduced low-involvement patient care by modeling behaviors of their nurse educator. Moreover, they valued a person-centered care model with an emphasis on the emotional part but left out decision-making as an individual right of people. Conclusions: The think-pair-share activities were useful to spark self-reflection among students, who identified aspects to change in their own practice, and reflected about their own education process, both of which promote change.
KW - Expert patient
KW - Nursing education
KW - Patient participation
KW - Person-centered care
KW - Social justice
KW - Expert patient
KW - Nursing education
KW - Patient participation
KW - Person-centered care
KW - Social justice
KW - Expert patient
KW - Nursing education
KW - Patient participation
KW - Person-centered care
KW - Social justice
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85180725518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/64830427-32d8-3aef-bbd8-035a0cf45616/
UR - https://portalrecerca.uab.cat/en/publications/f03494d8-95f4-42ed-bafb-5c3981c7e4d2
U2 - 10.1177/09697330231217038
DO - 10.1177/09697330231217038
M3 - Article
C2 - 38126762
AN - SCOPUS:85180725518
SN - 0969-7330
JO - Nursing Ethics
JF - Nursing Ethics
ER -