TY - JOUR
T1 - European LeukemiaNet 2017 risk stratification for acute myeloid leukemia :
T2 - validation in a risk-adapted protocol
AU - Bataller, Alex
AU - Garrido, Ana
AU - Guijarro, Francesca
AU - Oñate, Guadalupe
AU - Díaz-Beyá, Marina
AU - Arnan, Montserrat
AU - Tormo, Mar
AU - Vives Polo, Susana
AU - de Llano, María Paz Queipo
AU - Coll, Rosa
AU - Gallardo, David
AU - Vall-Llovera, Ferran
AU - Escoda, Lourdes
AU - Garcia-Guiñon, Antonio
AU - Salamero, Olga
AU - Sampol, Antonia
AU - Merchan, Brayan M.
AU - Bargay, Joan
AU - Castaño-Díez, Sandra
AU - Esteban, Daniel
AU - Oliver-Caldés, Aina
AU - Rivero, Andrea
AU - Mozas, Pablo
AU - López-Guerra, Mònica
AU - Pratcorona, Marta
AU - Zamora, Lurdes
AU - Costa, Dolors
AU - Rozman, Maria
AU - Nomdedeu, Josep
AU - Colomer, Dolors
AU - Brunet, Salut
AU - Sierra, Jorge
AU - Esteve Reyner, Jordi
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN 2017) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have become fundamental guidelines to assess the prognosis and postremission therapy of patients. However, they have been retrospectively validated in few studies with patients included in different treatment protocols. We analyzed 861 patients included in the Cooperativo Para el Estudio y Tratamiento de las Leucemias Agudas y Mielodisplasias-12 risk-adapted protocol, which indicates cytarabine-based consolidation for patients allocated to the ELN 2017 favorable-risk group, whereas it recommends allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) as a postremission strategy for the ELN 2017 intermediate- and adverse-risk groups. We retrospectively classified patients according to the ELN 2017, with 327 (48%), 109 (16%), and 245 (36%) patients allocated to the favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse-risk group, respectively. The 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 77% and 70% for favorable-risk patients, 52% and 46% for intermediate-risk patients, and 33% and 23% for adverse-risk patients, respectively. Furthermore, we identified a subgroup of patients within the adverse group (inv(3)/t(3;3), complex karyotype, and/or TP53 mutation/17p abnormality) with a particularly poor outcome, with a 2-year OS of 15%. Our study validates the ELN 2017 risk stratification in a large cohort of patients treated with an ELN-2017 risk-adapted protocol based on alloSCT after remission for nonfavorable ELN subgroups and identifies a genetic subset with a very poor outcome that warrants investigation of novel strategies.
AB - The 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN 2017) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have become fundamental guidelines to assess the prognosis and postremission therapy of patients. However, they have been retrospectively validated in few studies with patients included in different treatment protocols. We analyzed 861 patients included in the Cooperativo Para el Estudio y Tratamiento de las Leucemias Agudas y Mielodisplasias-12 risk-adapted protocol, which indicates cytarabine-based consolidation for patients allocated to the ELN 2017 favorable-risk group, whereas it recommends allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) as a postremission strategy for the ELN 2017 intermediate- and adverse-risk groups. We retrospectively classified patients according to the ELN 2017, with 327 (48%), 109 (16%), and 245 (36%) patients allocated to the favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse-risk group, respectively. The 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 77% and 70% for favorable-risk patients, 52% and 46% for intermediate-risk patients, and 33% and 23% for adverse-risk patients, respectively. Furthermore, we identified a subgroup of patients within the adverse group (inv(3)/t(3;3), complex karyotype, and/or TP53 mutation/17p abnormality) with a particularly poor outcome, with a 2-year OS of 15%. Our study validates the ELN 2017 risk stratification in a large cohort of patients treated with an ELN-2017 risk-adapted protocol based on alloSCT after remission for nonfavorable ELN subgroups and identifies a genetic subset with a very poor outcome that warrants investigation of novel strategies.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85125374112
U2 - 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005585
DO - 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005585
M3 - Article
C2 - 34911079
SN - 2473-9529
VL - 6
SP - 1193
EP - 1206
JO - Blood advances
JF - Blood advances
ER -