TY - JOUR
T1 - Differential effects of identification and discrimination training tasks on L2 vowel identification and discrimination
AU - Cebrian, Juli
AU - Gavaldà, Núria
AU - Gorba, Celia
AU - Carlet, Angélica
PY - 2024/11/1
Y1 - 2024/11/1
N2 - High variability phonetic training using perceptual tasks such as identification and discrimination tasks has often been reported to improve L2 perception. However, studies comparing the efficacy of different tasks on different measures are rare. Forty-four Catalan/Spanish bilingual learners of English were trained with identification or categorical discrimination tasks and were tested on both measures. Results showed that both methods were successful in improving identification and discrimination of English vowels. Training with nonword stimuli generalized to new nonwords and real word stimuli, and improvement was maintained four months later. Cross-task effects may be related to the categorical nature of the discrimination task, which may entail a level of processing similar to that of identification training. Interestingly, whereas identification training improved identification more than discrimination training, discrimination training did not enhance discrimination more than identification training. This asymmetry may be explained by task differences in the amount and type of feedback used.
AB - High variability phonetic training using perceptual tasks such as identification and discrimination tasks has often been reported to improve L2 perception. However, studies comparing the efficacy of different tasks on different measures are rare. Forty-four Catalan/Spanish bilingual learners of English were trained with identification or categorical discrimination tasks and were tested on both measures. Results showed that both methods were successful in improving identification and discrimination of English vowels. Training with nonword stimuli generalized to new nonwords and real word stimuli, and improvement was maintained four months later. Cross-task effects may be related to the categorical nature of the discrimination task, which may entail a level of processing similar to that of identification training. Interestingly, whereas identification training improved identification more than discrimination training, discrimination training did not enhance discrimination more than identification training. This asymmetry may be explained by task differences in the amount and type of feedback used.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85208687230
U2 - 10.1017/s0272263124000408
DO - 10.1017/s0272263124000408
M3 - Article
SN - 0272-2631
VL - 46
SP - 1069
EP - 1093
JO - Studies in Second Language Acquisition
JF - Studies in Second Language Acquisition
ER -