TY - JOUR
T1 - Culture and psychiatric evaluation: Operationalizing cultural formulation for DSM-5
AU - Lewis-Fernandez, Roberto
AU - Krishan Aggarwal, Neil
AU - Baarnhielm, Sofie
AU - Rohlof, Hans
AU - Kirmayer, Laurence J.
AU - Weiss, Mitchell G.
AU - Jadhav, Sushrut
AU - Hinton, Ladson
AU - Alarcon, Renato D.
AU - Bhugra, Dinesh
AU - Groen, Simon
AU - van Dijk, Rob
AU - Qureshi, Adil
AU - Collazos, Francisco
AU - Rousseau, Cecile
AU - Caballero, Luis
AU - Ramos, Mar
AU - Lu, Francis
PY - 2014/1/1
Y1 - 2014/1/1
N2 - © 2014 Washington School of Psychiatry. The Outline for Cultural Formulation (OCF) introduced with DSM-IV provided a framework for clinicians to organize cultural information relevant to diagnostic assessment and treatment planning. However, use of the OCF has been inconsistent, raising questions about the need for guidance on implementation, training, and application in diverse settings. To address this need, DSM-S introduced a cultural formulation interview (CF1) that operationalizes the process of data collection for the OCF. The CFI includes patient and informant versions and 12 supplementary modules addressing specific domains of the OCF. This article summarizes the literature reviews and analyses of experience with the OCF conducted by the DSM-5 Cross-Cultural Issues Subgroup (DCCIS) that informed the development of the CFI. We review the history and contents of the DSM-IV OCF, its use in training programs, and previous attempts to render it operational through questionnaires, protocols, and semi-structured interview formats. Results of research based on the OCF are discussed. For each domain of the OCF, we summarize findings from the DCCIS that led to content revision and operationalization in the CFI. The conclusion discusses training and implementation issues essential to service delivery.
AB - © 2014 Washington School of Psychiatry. The Outline for Cultural Formulation (OCF) introduced with DSM-IV provided a framework for clinicians to organize cultural information relevant to diagnostic assessment and treatment planning. However, use of the OCF has been inconsistent, raising questions about the need for guidance on implementation, training, and application in diverse settings. To address this need, DSM-S introduced a cultural formulation interview (CF1) that operationalizes the process of data collection for the OCF. The CFI includes patient and informant versions and 12 supplementary modules addressing specific domains of the OCF. This article summarizes the literature reviews and analyses of experience with the OCF conducted by the DSM-5 Cross-Cultural Issues Subgroup (DCCIS) that informed the development of the CFI. We review the history and contents of the DSM-IV OCF, its use in training programs, and previous attempts to render it operational through questionnaires, protocols, and semi-structured interview formats. Results of research based on the OCF are discussed. For each domain of the OCF, we summarize findings from the DCCIS that led to content revision and operationalization in the CFI. The conclusion discusses training and implementation issues essential to service delivery.
U2 - 10.1521/psyc.2014.77.2.130
DO - 10.1521/psyc.2014.77.2.130
M3 - Article
SN - 0033-2747
VL - 77
SP - 130
EP - 154
JO - Psychiatry (New York)
JF - Psychiatry (New York)
IS - 2
ER -