TY - JOUR
T1 - Consensus Statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR)
T2 - management and treatment of complete rectal prolapse
AU - Gallo, G.
AU - Martellucci, J.
AU - Pellino, G.
AU - Ghiselli, R.
AU - Infantino, A.
AU - Pucciani, F.
AU - Trompetto, M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2018/12/1
Y1 - 2018/12/1
N2 - Rectal prolapse, rectal procidentia, “complete” prolapse or “third-degree” prolapse is the full-thickness prolapse of the rectal wall through the anal canal and has a significant impact on quality of life. The incidence of rectal prolapse has been estimated to be approximately 2.5 per 100,000 inhabitants with a clear predominance among elderly women. The aim of this consensus statement was to provide evidence-based data to allow an individualized and appropriate management and treatment of complete rectal prolapse. The strategy used to search for evidence was based on application of electronic sources such as MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Review Library, CINAHL and EMBASE. The recommendations were defined and graded based on the current levels of evidence and in accordance with the criteria adopted by the American College of Gastroenterology’s Chronic Constipation Task Force. Five evidence levels were defined. The recommendations were graded A, B, and C.
AB - Rectal prolapse, rectal procidentia, “complete” prolapse or “third-degree” prolapse is the full-thickness prolapse of the rectal wall through the anal canal and has a significant impact on quality of life. The incidence of rectal prolapse has been estimated to be approximately 2.5 per 100,000 inhabitants with a clear predominance among elderly women. The aim of this consensus statement was to provide evidence-based data to allow an individualized and appropriate management and treatment of complete rectal prolapse. The strategy used to search for evidence was based on application of electronic sources such as MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Review Library, CINAHL and EMBASE. The recommendations were defined and graded based on the current levels of evidence and in accordance with the criteria adopted by the American College of Gastroenterology’s Chronic Constipation Task Force. Five evidence levels were defined. The recommendations were graded A, B, and C.
KW - Abdominal approach
KW - External rectal prolapse
KW - Non-operative management
KW - Perineal approach
KW - Rectal procidentia
KW - Surgical treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058466080&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10151-018-1908-9
DO - 10.1007/s10151-018-1908-9
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30554284
AN - SCOPUS:85058466080
SN - 1123-6337
VL - 22
SP - 919
EP - 931
JO - Techniques in Coloproctology
JF - Techniques in Coloproctology
IS - 12
ER -