TY - JOUR
T1 - Consensus and dissensus
T2 - changing perceptions of the public dimension of universities in a marketised environment
AU - Guzmán-Valenzuela, Carolina
AU - Barnett, Ronald
AU - Labraña, Julio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Association for Tertiary Education Management and the LH Martin Institute for Tertiary Education Leadership and Management.
PY - 2020/1/2
Y1 - 2020/1/2
N2 - In this paper, the public dimension of universities in Chile is examined. Interviews were held with academics at both public and private well-established universities and new private universities. The analysis shows a consensus regarding the production of certain public goods such as knowledge, wider access and the promotion of a public sphere. It also reveals a dissensus such that academics at well-established universities tend to maintain a statist view of the public university in which the state plays a key role while academics at new private universities characteristically adopt an individualist view in which the university is detached from the state and more focused on securing social mobility. Drawing on an Archerian framework, it is suggested that these perceptions have been shaped by global, national and especially institutional factors. Critical questions arise concerning the possibility of spaces for new perceptions of the public dimension of universities.
AB - In this paper, the public dimension of universities in Chile is examined. Interviews were held with academics at both public and private well-established universities and new private universities. The analysis shows a consensus regarding the production of certain public goods such as knowledge, wider access and the promotion of a public sphere. It also reveals a dissensus such that academics at well-established universities tend to maintain a statist view of the public university in which the state plays a key role while academics at new private universities characteristically adopt an individualist view in which the university is detached from the state and more focused on securing social mobility. Drawing on an Archerian framework, it is suggested that these perceptions have been shaped by global, national and especially institutional factors. Critical questions arise concerning the possibility of spaces for new perceptions of the public dimension of universities.
KW - academics’ perceptions
KW - Archer
KW - Higher education
KW - public
KW - qualitative research
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85071338403
U2 - 10.1080/1360080X.2019.1658850
DO - 10.1080/1360080X.2019.1658850
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85071338403
SN - 1360-080X
VL - 42
SP - 49
EP - 66
JO - Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
JF - Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
IS - 1
ER -